Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Cote-St-Luc, QC · Charitable organization

Centre D'Etudes Talmudiques de Cote-St-Luc

Enseignements & pratiques religieuses;

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$9k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$9,200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE BETH HAMIDRASHC$9,200
COMMUNAUTE BETH RAMBAMC$1,250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$82k · 8 repeat orgsC$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

C$82k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+9%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CENTRE BETH HAMIDRASH
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$25k · revenue +97%
  • CS
    COMMUNAUTE SEPHARADE DE COTE ST- LUC BETH RAMBAM
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$23k · revenue +39%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA
    3× · 2018–2021 · C$15k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • MC
    MIZRACHI CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -11%
  • FD
    FONDATION DES ENFANTS DE TSFATgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +53%
  • SD
    Societe d'assistance Matane Basseter Bessimha
    one grant, 2018 · C$300 · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
4
Semeurs De Charité/ Zoreah Tzedokos

Relief of poverty

—
5
Yeshiva Ohr Israel

Promouvoir les etudes religieuses juives et mettre en place des activites pour les jeunes de la communaute juive. aider les familles necessiteuses (paniers de provisions payment de factures ou de loyer en retard.

—
6
Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai

Gestion de synagogues banques alimentaires permanentes et pour les fetes juives aide necessiteux

—
7
Congregation Thora Vehaim

Promouvoir la culture sepharade - support aux ainés et famille nece ssiteuse - maintenir un lieu de priére adéquat

—
8
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
9
Tikvah L'Chaim/Tzohar

To sponser religious education and seminars. to support poor famalies.

—
10
Or Chadash

Scholarships were granted to qualified students wh desired to continue their education. our agent in isreal rabbi '...' must approve all scholarship applications to ensure that the students qualify for financial assisstance due to faily…

—
11
Association Ahavat Hessed
—
12
Briller dans le noir / Zurach Bachoshech

Relief of poverty focusing on paying for food to people in need in the jewish community as well as sending volunteers on a weekly basis to pay visits to ensure the well being of those who need it.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Beth Hamidrash and the most unlike its peers is Le Centre D'accomplissement Lanaar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE BETH HAMIDRASH — C$25,102 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE SEPHARADE DE COTE ST- LUC BETH RAMBAM — C$22,540 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA — C$14,860 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCongregation Beth Zion — C$9,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY - VMM — C$2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAISSE BETH YOSSEF — C$800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBANAV — C$750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DES ENFANTS DE TSFAT — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSociete d'assistance Matane Basseter Bessimha — C$300 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Institut CBMRayjo Charitable TrustFondation Miryam Berd…Gad and Sandra Bitton…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC9.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Institut CBM · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Gad and Sandra Bitton Family Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 872752696:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Centre D'Etudes Talmudiques de Cote-St-Luc’s filings →