Saint-Hyacinthe, QC · Charitable organization
Centre chrétien Dieu notre paix (C.C.D.N.P.)
Services tous les dimanches etudes bibliques reunions de prieres temps d'intimite avec dieu dons a des organismes de bienfaisance reunion du groupe feminin reunion du groupe masculin
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARREFOUR DU SUROIT | C$4,000 |
| EGLISE LE CHEMIN 14.6 | C$4,000 |
| EGLISE EVANGELIQUE DE VAUDREUIL SOULANGES | C$1,800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ADASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECOTE DU CANADA6× · 2017–2022 · C$10k · revenue +22%
- LGLES GEDEONS5× · 2017–2021 · C$5k · revenue +39%
- CDCAFE DES DEUX PAIN6× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +218%
Funded once
- HDHEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +56%
- CFChristians For Israel Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$500
- CECENTRE EVANGELIQUE DE CHATEAUGUAYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$434 · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Évangélisation de la communauté
Vendre des livres religieux à prix réduit dans les pays francophones en afrique et haïtï. faire don de livres chrétiens aux démunis. subventionner la traduction rédaction et édition le livres chrétiens francophone distribuer ces livre dans…
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Proclamer l'évangile de jésus- christ promouvoir la foi chrétienne par l'entremise d'enseignements bibliques ainsi que par la publication de livres et de littérature chrétienne.
Évangélisation par le biais de conférences enseignements livres etc.
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Propagation de la foi chrétienne incluant mais ne se limitant pas à : des émissions de télévision de la distribution de littérature ou autre forme de communication de l'écoute téléphonique de la formation et autres conférence ou ralliement…
Tenue d'une église
Établir maintenir et diriger une église de foi chrétienne
Lieux de culte congrégaitons paroisses diocèses e1 85% du temps organismes missionnaires évangélisation e2 15% du temps
Enseignement de l'évangile par la prédication lors du service le dimanche et sur semaine. proclamation de l'évangile. cours biblique. relation d'aide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Corporation Du Centre Evangelique De Chateauguay Inc. and the most unlike its peers is ÉGlise Le Chemin Jean 14.6. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LES MINISTÈRE REPARTIR A ZERO ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECOTE DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds LES GEDEONS ↗
- Who funds CAFE DES DEUX PAIN ↗
- Who funds CARREFOUR DU SUROIT ↗
- Who funds EGLISE LE CHEMIN 14.6 ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS FOR ISRAEL CANADA ↗
- Who funds JEUNESSE SANS LIMITE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds EGLISE EVANGELIQUE DE VAUDREUIL SOULANGES ↗
- Who funds Ecole Jesus-Marie ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE CANADA ↗
- Who funds HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE FRANCAIS L'INSULAIRE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE EVANGELIQUE DE CHATEAUGUAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.