Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization
Central Organization for Jewish Education Lubavitch British Columbia
The charity regularly convenes religious services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEMS - JEWISH EDUCATION MATTERS | C$7,300 |
| CHABAD OF COQUITLAM - CENTRE FOR JEWISH LIFE SOCIETY | C$4,800 |
| CHABAD OF VANCOUVER ISLAND | C$3,600 |
| CHABAD OF NANAIMO SOCIETY | C$2,300 |
| CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN VANCOUVER | C$1,800 |
| CHABAD HOUSE JEWISH STUDENT CENTRE SOCIETY - UEL | C$1,800 |
| CHABAD OKANAGAN SOCIETY | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CEChabad East Van - Centre for Jewish Life3× · 2020–2024 · C$59k · revenue +86% · 54% of their budget
- COChabad Okanagan Society6× · 2018–2024 · C$18k · revenue +97%
- MTMACHSON TZVI HERSH4× · 2019–2022 · C$13k · revenue +148%
Funded once
- COCHABAD OF RICHMONDone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +24%
- VHVancouver Hebrew Academyone grant, 2023 · C$250 · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.
The organization carries out religious and cultural programs to the jewish community in richmond hill and surrounding area
Religious study religious school education worship
Support for educational and shabbos programs helping the student programs helping the students discover their jewish heritage
To advance the teachings and religious tenets of the jewish faith by developing educational outreach and spiritual activities and events both locally and nationally.
Education religious social recreational programs as well as further the cause and objectives of traditional judaism
Promotion of Jewish education and family life throughout central Vancouver Island. Assistance in the observation of Jewish holidays and festivals. Provision of information on Jewish customs rituals and celebrations to the community at…
Religious activities and education in the jewish religion in vancouver b.c. - jewish education pastoral counseling and celebration of jewish holidays and holy days
Lectures religious events and programming yiddish language program religious articles provisions and services
Ancillary Judaics Program - afterschool orthodox education aimed at advancement of Jewish education
Gan Shalom Day Camp; Gan Shalom Nursery School; Club Monday for Children with Special Needs; Alef Champ Hebrew School; Jewish Learning Institute; Family synagogue.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad of Richmond and the most unlike its peers is Machson Tzvi Hersh Jewish Charity Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Chabad East Van - Centre for Jewish Life ↗
- Who funds CHABAD HOOUSE JEWISH CENTRE SOCIETY - UEL ↗
- Who funds Chabad Okanagan Society ↗
- Who funds MACHSON TZVI HERSH ↗
- Who funds JEMS - JEWISH EDUCATION MATTERS ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF VANCOUVER ISLAND ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF NANAIMO SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN VANCOUVER ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds Vancouver Hebrew Academy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zlc Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · Lohn Foundation · Jewish Federation of British Columbia · Marsid Family Foundation · My Charity Fund · Conam Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.