Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Sept-Iles, QC · Public foundation

Centraide Duplessis Inc.

Financer divers organismes de bienfaisance qui fournissent des services à vocations sociales

C$921k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$117k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$47k
  • C$10k–50k27 grants · C$630k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$243k
C$16,500
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE PORT-CARTIERC$117,264
L'ESPOIR DE SHELNAC$63,500
TRANSIT DE SEPT-ÎLESC$62,500
L'ENVOL MAISON DE LA FAMILLEC$40,500
À LA SOURCE SEPT-ÎLESC$40,500
FONDS IRÈNE GAUTHIERC$40,000
ÉKI-LIB SANTÉ CÔTE-NORDC$39,250
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE LE VIRAGEC$35,884
ACTION EMPLOI SEPT-ÎLESC$35,000
OASIS DE BEL ÂGEC$33,000
MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE PORT-CARTIERC$33,000
VILLA PORT-CARTIER (FONDS BÂTISSEURS)C$29,850
MAISON D'AIDE ET D'HÉBERGEMENT DE FERMONTC$27,500
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE LA MINGANIEC$24,000
HOMME SEPT-ÎLESC$22,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 75% of grant dollars (C$2.9M). The 25% that went abroad (C$967k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 25% of all-years giving (C$967k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.4M · 41 repeat orgsC$535k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
28

Total granted

C$3.4M
C$398k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+105%

Still filing today

54%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$136k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    TRANSIT DE SEPT-ÎLES
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$431k · revenue +109%
  • LM
    L'ENVOL MAISON DE LA FAMILLE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$293k · revenue +42%
  • LD
    L'ESPOIR DE SHELNA
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$221k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAISON DES ORGANISMES COMMUNAUTAIRES DE SEPT-ÎLES
    one grant, 2023 · C$77k
  • IT
    INNU TAKUAIKAN UASHAT MAK MANI-UTENAM
    one grant, 2023 · C$50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · C$40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L'entraide Chez Nous

Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile

—
2
Le Repas du Passant

Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire

—
3
Logis Des Aulniers
—
4
Service D'entraide De Pintendre

Service de soutien à domicile accompagnement tramsport popote roulante aide à l'épicerie. 100 bénévoles plus de 6000 heures de bénévolat par année.

—
5
Logis Du Bel Age

Hébergement pour personnes âgées autonomes et semi-autonomes

—
6
Centre Action GÉNÉRations Des aÎNÉS De La VallÉE-De-La-LiÈVre
—
7
Le Gite de Saint-Isidore

Logements aux personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie et services s'y rattachant

—
8
L'envol S.R.T. Service De Retour Au Travail
—
9
Maison Véro & Louis (Varennes)

Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes

—
10
Loge M'entraide
—
11
J'ai Mon Appart'
—
12
Le service alimentaire communautaire (S.a.C.)

Soulager la faim en donnant des denrés alimentaires et rendre les personnes plus autonomes

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre d'Action Bénévole de Port-Cartier inc. and the most unlike its peers is Recyk et Frip. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/30
Grantees still filing
27/30
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRANSIT DE SEPT-ÎLES — C$430,512 over 7y, 15% of budgetL'ENVOL MAISON DE LA FAMILLE — C$293,381 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetL'ESPOIR DE SHELNA — C$220,594 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetLA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE PORT-CARTIER — C$187,114 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetCENTRE D'INTERVENTION LE ROND-POINT — C$148,848 over 7y, 13% of budgetFONDS IRÈNE GAUTHIER — C$143,600 over 7y, 97% of budgetHOMME SEPT-ÎLES — C$141,911 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetL'ÂTRE DE SEPT-ÎLES — C$128,075 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetÉKI-LIB SANTÉ CÔTE-NORD — C$110,210 over 7y, 64% of budgetCOMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE SEPT-ÎLES — C$107,151 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE LE VIRAGE — C$107,084 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetOASIS DE BEL ÂGE — C$101,542 over 7y, 14% of budgetASSOCIATION DES AIDANTS NATURELS DE LA CÔTE-NORD — C$98,960 over 7y, 13% of budgetA.P.A.M.E. — C$85,550 over 7y, 13% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE LA MINGANIE — C$79,461 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetCENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DU PARC-FERLAND — C$69,136 over 7y, 18% of budgetLA MAISON DU TONNERRE — C$68,789 over 7y, 17% of budgetCENTRE LE VOLET DES FEMMES — C$63,932 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetCLUB DES CITOYENS SENIORS DE CHEVERY — C$62,521 over 6y, 12% of budgetCentre de Bénévolat de Port-Cartier — C$55,617 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFRIPERIE RECYK ET FRIP — C$21,551 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMODULE D'ÉPANOUISSEMENT À LA VIE DE SEPT-ÎLES — C$19,015 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetÉLYME DES SABLES — C$15,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRE ALPHA LIRA — C$13,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCRIC DE PORT-CARTIER — C$8,726 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetHOM'MASCULIN — C$8,310 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetDÉFI JEUNESSE — C$7,664 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCHANTIER JEUNESSE LOISIR — C$7,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetA.S.L.S.C.P.V.H. — C$6,355 over 4y, 31% of budgetANON DE SEPT-ÎLES INC. — C$900 over 1y, 42% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRANSIT DE SEPT-ÎLES ↗
  • Who funds L'ENVOL MAISON DE LA FAMILLE ↗
  • Who funds L'ESPOIR DE SHELNA ↗
  • Who funds LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE PORT-CARTIER ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE D'INTERVENTION LE ROND-POINT ↗
  • Who funds FONDS IRÈNE GAUTHIER ↗
  • Who funds HOMME SEPT-ÎLES ↗
  • Who funds L'ÂTRE DE SEPT-ÎLES ↗
  • Who funds ÉKI-LIB SANTÉ CÔTE-NORD ↗
  • Who funds COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE SEPT-ÎLES ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE LE VIRAGE ↗
  • Who funds OASIS DE BEL ÂGE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION DES AIDANTS NATURELS DE LA CÔTE-NORD ↗
  • Who funds A.P.A.M.E. ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE LA MINGANIE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DU PARC-FERLAND ↗
  • Who funds LA MAISON DU TONNERRE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE LE VOLET DES FEMMES ↗
  • Who funds CLUB DES CITOYENS SENIORS DE CHEVERY ↗
  • Who funds Centre de Bénévolat de Port-Cartier ↗
  • Who funds FRIPERIE RECYK ET FRIP ↗
  • Who funds MODULE D'ÉPANOUISSEMENT À LA VIE DE SEPT-ÎLES ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Steelworkers Humanity…Fondation Laure Gaudr…Les Banques alimentai…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Steelworkers Humanity Fund IncON13.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Steelworkers Humanity Fund Inc · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · Les Banques alimentaires du Québec / Food Banks of Québec · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 130387277:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Centraide Duplessis’ filings →