Bolton, ON · Charitable organization
Center of Life Church
Weekly spiritual worship with the Christian Teaching and mentoring spiritual counseling and prayer the the troubled individuals
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Redeemed Christian Church of God | C$1,000 |
| Faith Contenders Ministries | C$1,000 |
| Milton District Hospital Foundation | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- KCKENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES4× · 2017–2021 · C$7k · revenue -20%
- CECutting Edge Word Ministries Intenational2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +93%
- HOHouse Of Praise The Redeemed Christian Church2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- PCPrevailers Churchone grant, 2021 · C$2k
- AOAssociation of Nigerian Commuintyone grant, 2021 · C$800
- GWGLORIOUS WOMEN OF WONDER PRAYER MINISTRYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue ×14
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preaching the word of God
Preaching and bible study - telephone prayer meeting and evangelism
Weekly worship services
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Preaching and teaching the word of god and counselling(sun. 10:00am-1:00pm) visitation & counselling (sun. 4:00pm-7:00pm) bible study (wed. 7:00pm-8:00pm) holy communion service (fri. 7:00pm-8:00pm) annointing service every last friday of…
Weekly Sunday service Weekly Bible study (Tuesdays) Monthly prayer vigil Evangelism and outreaches
Gospel outreach and christian audio tv broadcasting christian programs to all over the world
Church services theology trainings prayer meetings Sunday worship Sunday school Bible studies fellowship functions missions children and youth program.
Bible studies prayer meetings
I) on sundays we have our family worship program to preach and advance spiritual teachings on christianity ii) on tuesday's and thursdays we study the bible and pray
To advance religion by preacing the teachings and religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with christian faith.
Christian broadcasting live streaming internet television proclaiming the gospel message of the Lord Jesus Christ using television and internet media. Regular worship services and teaching the Word of God.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Praise - the Redeemed Christian Church of God and the most unlike its peers is The Milton District Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Cutting Edge Word Ministries Intenational ↗
- Who funds House Of Praise The Redeemed Christian Church ↗
- Who funds The Redeemed Christian Church of God ↗
- Who funds Faith Contenders Ministries ↗
- Who funds Milton District Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds GLORIOUS WOMEN OF WONDER PRAYER MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Canada Christian College & School Of Graduate Theological St ↗
- Who funds T.D. Jakes Ministries Canada ↗
- Who funds 700 Club canada ↗
- Who funds The New Testament Church of Christ The Redeemer Of Canada ↗
- Who funds THE REDEEM EVANGELICAL MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.