Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montréal, QC · Private foundation

Celine & Jacques Lamarre Foundation /

Faire des dons à des donataires reconnus selon la définition de la loi de l'impôt sur le revenu (canada) ou de la loi sur les impôts (québec) impliqués dans le domaine philanthropique.

C$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k16 grants · C$43k
  • C$10k–50k12 grants · C$190k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$5,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DU CENTRE UNIVERSITAIRE MCGILLC$50,000
CENTRAIDEC$30,000
FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKEC$20,000
MAISON ST-RAPHAËLC$20,000
FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ LAVALC$20,000
FONDATION DE L'INSITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉALC$20,000
ST. GEORGE'S COLLEGE FOUNDATIONC$15,000
UNIVERSITÉ DE WATERLOOC$15,000
FONDATION DE L'ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE MONTREALC$10,000
FONDATION DU MUSÉE D'ART CONTEMPORAINC$10,000
FONDATION DU COLLÈGE JEAN-DE-BRÉBEUFC$10,000
FONDATION CENTRE PHILOUC$10,000
FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL DE MONTRÉALC$10,000
OXFAM-QUÉBECC$5,000
MISSION BON ACCUEILC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.1M · 39 repeat orgsC$105k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
21

Total granted

C$2.1M
C$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+43%

Still filing today

97%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UD
    UNIVERSITÉ DE WATRERLOO
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$700k · revenue +31%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CENTRE UNIVERSITAIRE MCGILL
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$235k · revenue +175%
  • C
    CENTRAIDE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$215k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL
    one grant, 2022 · C$20k
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CANCER DES CÈDRESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$11k · revenue +43%
  • TA
    THE ART MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF TORONTOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
2
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
3
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
4
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
5
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
6
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
7
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
8
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
9
Fondation de L'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement de la recherche et des services à la collectivité de l'université du québec à trois-rivières ainsi que remettre des bourses aux étudiants. dons accessibles aux étudiants et aux…

—
10
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Québec

Récompenser et encourager l'excellence la créativité et la détermination des artistes de la génération montante. dons à l'orchestre symphonique de québec

—
11
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
12
La fondation de l'institut thoracique de Montréal / the Montréal Chest Institute Foundation

Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is University of Waterloo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
47/60
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITÉ DE WATRERLOO — C$700,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE UNIVERSITAIRE MCGILL — C$235,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAIDE — C$215,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU MUSÈE DES BEAUX-ARTS — C$105,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DE LÈUNIVERSITÉ LAVAL — C$105,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetFONDATION CENTRE PHILOU — C$78,750 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION DU COLLÈGE JEAN DE BRÉBEUF — C$60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'INSITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉAL — C$60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÈ DE SHERBROOKE — C$60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE LÈHÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL DE MONTRÉAL — C$57,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE MONTREAL — C$55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFONDS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT COLLÈGE BRÉBEUF — C$45,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCARE CANADA URGENCE INDONÉSIE — C$41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST. GEORGE'S COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$40,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCIFAR — C$30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHOREFAST FOUNDATION — C$30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSICK KIDS FOUNDATION — C$22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU MUSÉE D'ART CONTEMPORAIN — C$22,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOXFAM-QUÈBEC — C$20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON ST-RAPHAËL — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION DES YMCA DU QUÉBEC — C$18,370 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DU MUSÈE MCCORD — C$18,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLES IMPATIENTS — C$15,410 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDANS LA RUE — C$13,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUT ÉCONOMIQUE DE MONTRÉAL — C$12,650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSECIÉTÉ DE RECHECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER — C$12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CANCER DES CÈDRES — C$11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ART MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION BON ACCUEIL — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE POLYTECHNIQUE — C$9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLYCÉE FRANCAIS DE TORONTO — C$8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CHUM — C$6,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA SOINS À DOMICILE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLE PHARE MAISON FAMILLE — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION INSTITUT DE GÈRIATRIE DE MONTRÈAL — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION ÉPIC — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetÉCOLE NATIONALE DE THÉATRE DU CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION YVON LAMARRE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION INCLUSION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÈTÈ ALZHEIMER DU CANADA — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRENAISSANCE LAC BROME — C$4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLES AMIS DE LA MONTAGNE (MONT-ROYAL) INC. — C$3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRASER INSTITUTE — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMIS DE L'UNVERSITÉ PONTIFICALE DE LA SAINTE-CROIX — C$3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ MCGILL - FONDS DU CENTRE LUDMER — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER — C$1,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION JEANNE-MANCE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…La Fondation du Grand…Fondation Philantra P…Conam Charitable Foun…Fondation J.A. DeseveMorris and Rosalind G…The Molson Foundation…Wcpd FoundationFondation Sibylla Hes…La Fondation Rossy th…The Libermont Foundat…The Azrieli Foundatio…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC19.6× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · The Molson Foundation/Fondation Molson · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation · The Libermont Foundation/La Fondation Libermont · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 835783663:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Celine & Jacques Lamarre Foundation /’s filings →