Skip to content

Pointe Claire, QC · Charitable organization

Cedar Park united church

Ceder park holds worship services every sunday and on special occasions (wednesday in lent christmas eve good friday etc.).

C$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$7,858
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$485k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (MONTREAL PRESBYTERY)C$13,207
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (MISSION & SERVICE FUND)C$7,858
WEST ISLAND MISSIONC$800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$181k · 9 repeat orgsC$34k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

C$181k
C$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+81%

Still filing today

44%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada (Mission & Service Fund)
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$83k · revenue +22%
  • WI
    WEST ISLAND CITIZEN ADVOCACY
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$2k · revenue +22%
  • MC
    MONTREAL CITY MISSION
    2× · 2018–2023 · C$2k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (MISSION & SERVICE FUND)
    one grant, 2020 · C$12k
  • WI
    West Island Palliative Care Residencegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +108%
  • WI
    WEST ISLAND ASSITANCE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +103%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Résidence de soins palliatifs Teresa-Dellar inc./ Teresa Dellar Palliative Care Residence Inc.

The organization's mission is to maintain and operate palliative care services in the west island of montréal. the montreal institute for palliative care is a branch of the teresa dellar palliative care residence and ensures that community…

—
2
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

Soins hospitaliers

—
3
Fondation Quebecoise Du Cancer Inc.

La fondation québécoise du cancer soutient les personnes et leurs proches ici au Québec par des services axés sur leurs besoins et préoccupations quotidiennes. Nous sommes là au coeur de l'épreuve pour écouter informer réconforter…

—
4
Organisation D'aide Aux Sans-Emploi (O.D.a.S.- Montreal)

Aide et support aux personnes sans emploi

—
5
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
6
Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des Iles

Le Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des Îles a pour objet d'exploiter un centre local de services communautaires un centre d'hébergement et de soins de longue durée un centre hospitalier de soins généraux et spécialisés et un…

—
7
Fondation Du Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

La foundation du chum a pour objectifs d'établir d'organiser de maintenir d'administrer et de développer des fonds pour promouvoir l'amélioration des soins l'excellence de l'enseignement et l'avancement de la recherche en général au centre…

—
8
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
9
Infologis de l'Est de L'Ile de Montréal

Aide au logement

—
10
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
11
Fonds de charité des employés de la Ville de Montréal

Campagne annuelle de levée de fonds auprès des employés de la ville de montréal i. remise aux organismes de bienfaisances désignés par les employés donateurs des sommes recueilles annuellement.

—
12
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services SociauxDu Centre-Ouest-de-L'Île-de-Montréal

Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout out network of institution provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experience develop and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parrainage Civique de la Banlieue Ouest de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada (Mission & Service Fund) — C$83,322 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWest Island Palliative Care Residence — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST ISLAND ASSITANCE FUND — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEST ISLAND CITIZEN ADVOCACY — C$2,410 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChez Doris — C$2,325 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONTREAL CITY MISSION — C$2,124 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH — C$2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST ISLAND MISSION — C$1,727 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVolunteer West Island — C$1,280 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOMEGA COMMUNITY RESOURCES — C$1,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEquipe Entreprise — C$1,135 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSJ-VOBOC — C$1,125 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWest Island Cancer Wellness — C$1,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Theological College — C$675 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada (Mission & Service Fund) ↗
  • Who funds West Island Palliative Care Residence ↗
  • Who funds WEST ISLAND ASSITANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds WEST ISLAND CITIZEN ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds Chez Doris ↗
  • Who funds MONTREAL CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WEST ISLAND MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Volunteer West Island ↗
  • Who funds OMEGA COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds Equipe Entreprise ↗
  • Who funds SJ-VOBOC ↗
  • Who funds West Island Cancer Wellness ↗
  • Who funds United Theological College ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Partage-action de l'ouest-de-l'île / West-island community sharesQC12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Partage-action de l'ouest-de-l'île / West-island community shares · La Fondation des Anciens de Pointe-Claire / Pointe-Claire Oldtimers Foundation · La Fabrique de la Paroisse de Saint-Luc · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · St. Michael and All Angels Church · The Tenaquip Foundation / la Fondation Tenaquip · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 106883366:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Cedar Park united church’s filings →