Skip to content

Port Alberni, BC · Charitable organization

Cedar Grove Reformed Church

Our church continued sunday services and weekly bible study sesions.

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,358
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITANS PURSEC$1,358
SALVATION ARMYC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$12k · 5 repeat orgsC$9k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

C$12k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-34%
+26%

Still filing today

40%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITANS PURSE
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$6k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$2k
  • RC
    REFORMED CHURCH IN CANADA-WORDS OF HOPE
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue -42%

Funded once

  • 7D
    7TH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -63%
  • SP
    SAMARITANS PURSE
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k
  • SP
    Samaritans Purse
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation

Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation was created to seek sources of gifts to fund a program of grantmaking to qualified donees other than private foundations. It is dedicated to helping donors increase and sustain their charitable giving…

—
2
Sickkids Charitable Giving Fund

SickKids Charitable Giving Fund (a public charity) offers donors an opportunity to support their favourite charities through donor advised funds. Donors establish their own named fund and make irrevocable gifts to the fund while explicitly…

—
3
Adventist Care Foundation Inc.

To raise funds from investments and donations in order to assist nursing homes and senior residences under the aegis of the manitoba-saskatchewan conference of the seventh-day adventist church by donating funds equipment and services.

—
4
BeLoved Care Reformed Community

Relief of the aged

—
5
Royal College Canada International (Rcci)/

To promote and provide educational and medical expertise and technologies to international clients who want to improve their health systems and outcomes. To make gifts to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the Income Tax…

—
6
Abundance Canada

Provide charitable gift planning options manage donated funds and distribute donated funds to qualified donees.

—
7
Good Samaritan Canada (a Lutheran Social Services Organization)

Operating long term care nursing homes licensed care and assisted living care homes and related support programs. primarily for seniors with limited care beds for young adults.some senior housing also provided under the guidlines of the…

—
8
Valley Christian Service Foundation Incorporated

To apply income and or capital of the foundation toward the advancement of charitable projects or causes.

—
9
Care Camps of Canada

Mission: To give joy hope and healing power of the outdoors to children with cancer and their families at a specialized oncology camp. Vision: With your help Care Camps will provide hope and healing to every child and family member…

—
10
Nanny Angel Network Inc.

The nanny angel network provides free professional relief childcare for families with cancer in the province of ontario. the organization provides care for children aged 16 and under and also provides timely compassionate support to…

—
11
Sunshine Fund for Kids and Causes

Sunshine Fund for Kids and Causes operates on a donor-advised fund that makes gifts to qualified donees. In any one year, BC Children's Hospital Foundation is the recipient of at least 50% of Sunshine Fund for Kids and Causes gifts to…

—
12
Desert Valley Hospice Society

Hospice programs advance care planning supportive care programs grief/bereavment programs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada/Conseil De Direction De L'armÉE Du Salut Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Alberni Valley Hospice Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget7TH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREFORMED CHURCH IN CANADA-WORDS OF HOPE — C$2,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSamaritans Purse — C$1,249 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRYAN WELL FOUNDATION — C$750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHugginz by Angel Foundation — C$500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALBERNI VALLEY HOSPICE SOCIETY — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPrison Fellowship, Angel Tree — C$221 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Strategic Charitable Giving FoundationON5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 891026387:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Cedar Grove Reformed Church’s filings →