Dapp, AB · Charitable organization
Cedar Creek Christian Fellowship
Church services bible studies prayer meetings youth/children's programs education community outreach assisting missionaries
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$9k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF PENTECOST | C$14,500 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION (B.C. SOCIETY) | C$7,000 |
| PEMBINA BIBLE CAMP | C$600 |
| APOSTOLIC YOUTH MINISTRIES | C$500 |
| ESTON COLLEGE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PBPembina Bible Camp4× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +20%
- TGTHE GIDEONS2× · 2017–2020 · C$6k · revenue +39%
- HRHOPE RESOURCE CENTRE5× · 2017–2021 · C$4k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- YWYouth with a Mission (BC) Societyone grant, 2017 · C$7k
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSIONone grant, 2022 · C$5k
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth groups men's and ladies ministries in dition to bible study groups and camps.
The organization's purpose is to preach teach advance disseminate and demonstrate the gospel of jesus christ and the related truths of the holy bible to people everywhere.
Youth conferences Worship services Leadership and Evangelism.
Overnight Bible Camp providing camp experience for children and families
Youth unlimited is a faith based organization that meets youth where they are at. it is about building genuine relationships supporting youth and loving them without judgement through various support programs.
Offering programs that mobilize youth and young adults to promote christian faith and principles. the programs inculde summer missions with teens year round missions with young adults conferences for young leaders and various camps.
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Christian summer camp for teens and younger.
Bible camp with daily ministry.
Summer camps for individuals of all ages in a Christian setting.
Counselling bible camps family teachings
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth for Christ Westlock Association and the most unlike its peers is Teen Time of Edmonton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.