Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Mississauga, ON · Charitable organization

Catholic Girls' School of Greater Toronto

Private catholic girls school offering educational learning for girls from grades 5 to grade 12 to educate the person intellectually morally spiritually and aesthetically within the roman catholic faith.

C$605
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$300
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$275
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAN CANADAC$300
NATIVE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTREC$275
MONESTARY OF MOUNT CARMELC$30
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 6 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

C$3k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+21%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC.
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$724 · revenue +13%
  • S
    SHARELIFE
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$500 · revenue +32%
  • NW
    NATIVE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTRE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$451 · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TERRY FOX FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k
  • SF
    ST. FELIX CENTRE
    one grant, 2021 · C$750 · revenue -10%
  • OB
    ONTARIO BLACK HISTORY SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · C$305 · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
2
Fund Homecare Canada

Fund Homecare Canada is a Canadian registered charitable not-for-profit organization dedicated to making in-home care accessible to palliative cancer patients—a critical and prevalent need that is unfortunately out of reach for many. We…

—
3
The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

SickKids Foundation has been inspiring our communities since 1972 to invest in improving the lives of children and their families. Donor support is a critical source of funding for the Hospital for Sick Children and in recent years has…

—
4
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
5
Prostate Cancer Canada

Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…

—
6
Stand Up to Cancer Canada

Funding of Breast Cancer Research Stem Cell Research Metastatic Cancer Research & Pancreatic Cancer Research.

—
7
Bc Cancer Foundation

The bc cancer foundation is the fundraising partner of bc cancer and the largest charitable funder of cancer research in this province. we enable donors to make contributions to leading-edge research that has a direct impact on…

—
8
The Cedars Cancer Foundation at the McGill University Health Centre / La fondation du cancer des cèdres au centre universitaire de santé McGill

Purchases diagnostic equipments improve facilities for treatment and care of cancer patients continue to develop the cansupport program which offer patients and their families for psychological and humanitarian assistance support cancer…

—
9
Casey House Foundation

Casey House Foundation raises funds to support exemplary health care and compassionate support at Casey House a hospital unlike any other. As a sub-acute specialty hospital in Toronto they offer comprehensive inpatient and outpatient…

—
10
The Terry Fox Research Institute

The Terry Fox Research Institute ('TFRI') operates as a virtual institute bringing together multi-disciplinary teams of cancer researchers to work on integrated translational research projects. TFRI manages its research granting programs…

—
11
Pancreatic Cancer Canada Cancer du Pancreas Canada

Research: provided continued funding for an early detection study called prosperpanc that aims to identify biomarkers for faster diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as well as a study assessing the current landscape of palliative care in…

—
12
Canadian Health Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sharelife and the most unlike its peers is The Monastery of Mount Carmel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST. FELIX CENTRE — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC. — C$724 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARELIFE — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTRE — C$451 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE PATRIOT LOVE FOUNDATION — C$450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONTARIO BLACK HISTORY SOCIETY — C$305 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONESTARY OF MOUNT CARMEL — C$193 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIAN ANDERSON HOUSE FOUNDATION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Golden Hor…Raymond James Canada …Toronto FoundationCharitable Gift Funds…Charities Aid Foundat…BenefAction FoundationMy Tribute Gift Found…Strategic Charitable …United Way of Greater…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
United Way Golden HorseshoeON8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Toronto Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · BenefAction Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 835245614:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Catholic Girls' School of Greater Toronto’s filings →