Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Caring Kindness Charitable Organization

Solicit individuals for charitable donations for the relief of poverty and the further the advancement of jewish education in accordance with the traditions of orthodox judaism.

C$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$34k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$6k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$34k
C$34,419
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$34,419
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$6,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$308k · 6 repeat orgsC$39k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

C$308k
C$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+21%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$137k · revenue +423%
  • GO
    GATES OF MERCY
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$54k
  • BO
    BETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$53k

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    one grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue +21%
  • VM
    VAAD MISHMERES MITZVOS
    one grant, 2017 · C$14k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FUNDS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
2
Zolty Charitable Foundation

Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.

—
3
B'nai Zion Charity Fund

The relief of poverty the advancement of religion and the furtherance of education.

—
4
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
5
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
6
The Yad Ezer Fund
—
7
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
8
Olam Chesed Yobone Fund
—
9
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—
10
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
11
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
12
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Chasidei Bobov and the most unlike its peers is Bais Yaakov Elementary School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$136,922 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGATES OF MERCY — C$53,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$52,644 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DANA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$30,100 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$15,109 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FUNDS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — C$3,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOBOV — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI ZION — C$225 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David Kutner Fami…The Thomas Hofstedter…Moral Arc Foundation
The David Kutner Family FoundationON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David Kutner Family Foundation · The Thomas Hofstedter Family Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 859324279:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Caring Kindness Charitable Organization’s filings →