Cardinal, ON · Charitable organization
Cardinal Community Church
In 2024 philadelphia pentecostal continued to have ongoing worship services and various small group including and active senior ministry.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$9k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE EASTERN ONTARIO AND NUNAVUT DISTRICT OF THE PAOC | C$11,764 |
| PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$5,092 |
| MOTION CHURCH | C$2,500 |
| UPPER CANADA DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD | C$1,500 |
| ERDO | C$225 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TETHE EASTERN ONTARIO AND NUNAVUT DISTRICT OF THE PAOC8× · 2017–2024 · C$72k · revenue +4%
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$42k · revenue +22%
- MCMOTION CHURCH2× · 2023–2024 · C$8k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- BBBEACON BAGSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +57%
- SCSEAWAY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLYone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +23%
- FCFIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONSone grant, 2019 · C$600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the gospel of jesus christ though preaching teaching the organization of services the exercise of discipline on the clergy and oversight of congregation within its bounds
Preaching Teaching
Proclamation and teaching of the gospel through ongoing study worship and prayer; our meetings and gatherings cross and engage all demographics.
We hold sunday services teach bible studies have out reach activities.
Church Operations
Propagation of the christian faith
Proclamation of the gospel of jesus christ every lord’s day weekly prayer meetings administration of baptism and the lord’s supper weekly bible classes visiting the sick
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Eastern Ontario District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Upper Canada District School Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE EASTERN ONTARIO AND NUNAVUT DISTRICT OF THE PAOC ↗
- Who funds PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MOTION CHURCH ↗
- Who funds UPPER CANADA DISTRICT SCOOL BOARD ↗
- Who funds ST. PAUL'S ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR ALL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BEACON BAGS ↗
- Who funds SEAWAY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds ERDO (EMERGENCY RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT OVERSEAS) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Highway Pentecostal Church · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.