Toronto, ON · Private foundation
Canadian Tire Jumpstart Charities/Oeuvre Bon Depart de Canadian Tire
Canadian tire jumpstart charities (jumpstart) helps financially disadvantaged children gain the benefits associated with participating in sports and recreational activities by providing funding to assist with cost of registration equipment and transportation.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k346 grants · C$1.8M
- C$10k–50k266 grants · C$5.3M
- C$50k–250k35 grants · C$2.8M
- C$250k+10 grants · C$6.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVER ACTIVE SCHOOLS | C$1,254,708 |
| FONDATION BON DÉPART DE CANADIAN TIRE DU QUÉBEC INC. | C$1,028,497 |
| SPIRIT NORTH | C$1,000,000 |
| MACROMIND MEDIA INC. | C$750,000 |
| CANADA BASKETBALL | C$518,713 |
| FOUNDATION FOR BLACK COMMUNITIES | C$500,000 |
| FREE PLAY FOR KIDS INC. | C$483,808 |
| ABILITIES CENTRE DURHAM | C$300,000 |
| 4GLOBAL US INC | C$265,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$262,500 |
| DOUG PHILPOTT INNER-CITY CHILDREN'S TENNIS FUND | C$180,000 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN GOLF ASSOCIATION/ASSOCIATION ROYALE DE GOLF D | C$170,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$160,000 |
| SURREY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 36 | C$130,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN SPORT | C$125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 10% of grant dollars (C$12M). The 90% that went abroad (C$108M) is mapped below.
Which regions your grants reach
Beyond home — 90% of all-years giving (C$108M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
1067 repeat relationships — 301 still active in FY2024, 766 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4.7M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EAEVER ACTIVE SCHOOLS7× · 2018–2024 · C$4.8M
- SNSPIRIT NORTH6× · 2019–2024 · C$3.0M
- ACABILITIES CENTRE7× · 2017–2023 · C$2.5M
Funded once
- SDSchool District No.36 (Surrey)one grant, 2017 · C$315k
- TCThe Corporation of the City of Wellandone grant, 2021 · C$300k
- SDSchool District No.68one grant, 2017 · C$290k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.