Skip to content

Markdale, ON · Charitable organization

Canadian Spine Research & Education Fund

Funding research and education with respect to the spine for the improvement of medical treatment of spinal disease and injuries to the spine.

C$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$47k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$105k
C$40,698
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$324k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRAXIS SPINAL CORD INSTITUTEC$46,515
MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITALC$40,698
CANADIAN SPINE SOCIETYC$18,000
ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$2,394
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 90% of grant dollars (C$442k). The 10% that went abroad (C$51k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 10% of all-years giving (C$51k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$412k · 3 repeat orgsC$81k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

C$412k
C$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MONTREAL GRENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$223k · revenue -4%
  • PS
    PRAXIS SPINAL CORD INSTITUTE
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$149k · revenue +3%
  • RU
    ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC.
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$40k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RU
    ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC.
    one grant, 2021 · C$33k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
    one grant, 2021 · C$30k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTREAL GRENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$223,198 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPRAXIS SPINAL CORD INSTITUTE — C$148,515 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC. — C$39,894 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under core health care.

Source object 826841223:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canadian Spine Research & Education’s filings →