Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Public foundation

Canadian Special Olympics Foundation

Ongoing programs in support of special olympics canada: develop fundraising strategies.

C$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
Regions reached
C$658k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$57k
  • C$50k–250k5 grants · C$568k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$1.1M
C$72,201
Median grant
8
Regions reached
C$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIOC$658,229
SPECIAL OLYMPICS CANADAC$422,070
SPECIAL OLYMPICS BRITISH COLUMBIAC$192,425
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ALBERTAC$152,788
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NOVA SCOTIAC$95,283
OLYMPIQUES SPECIAUX QUEBECC$72,201
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MANITOBAC$55,431
Individual grant recipientC$25,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDC$21,195
SPECIAL OLYMPICS SASKATCHEWANC$10,614
Individual grant recipientC$5,198
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Which regions your grants reach

Ontario
C$9.3M
Alberta
C$1.4M
British Columbia
C$1.1M
Manitoba
C$654k
Nova Scotia
C$517k
Quebec
C$346k
Saskatchewan
C$190k
Prince Edward Island
C$100k
New Brunswick
C$30k

Grants placed by each grantee’s location, read from the T3010 filings.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$13M · 11 repeat orgsC$797k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

C$13M
C$767k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3.8M · revenue +22%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS CANADA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.8M · revenue +36%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS BRITISH COLUMBIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.3M · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO
    one grant, 2021 · C$416k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ALBERTA
    one grant, 2020 · C$283k
  • SO
    Special Olympics Nova Scotia
    one grant, 2017 · C$68k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Olympics Yukon Society

Provide training support and opportunities for sport and recreation activities for individuals with an intellectual disability provide sport competition opportunities for these athletes.

—
2
Special Olympics Newfoundland and Labrador Inc.

Enriching the lives of newfoundlanders and labradorians with an intellectual disability through sport.

—
3
Special Olympics 2018 National Games Society
—
4
N.W.T. Special Olympics

Weekly training opportunities for athletes with an intellectual disability in the following sports; swimming bowling figure skating speed skating golf track and field snowshoeing gymnastics and general fitness.

—
5
Canada Special Olympics 2016 Games Organizing Committee Inc.
—
6
Sports for Special Athletes Inc.

The organization provides athletic programs and qualified instructors to developmentally and physically handicapped adults in kitchener waterloo and surrounding area. competitions are occasionally held with similar organizations from other…

—
7
Canadian Special Olympics Foundation

Ongoing programs in support of special olympics canada: develop fundraising strategies. enhance the financial wellbeing of the movement. increase participation by individuals with an intellectual disability. increase recruitment of…

—
8
Canadian Cerebral Palsy Sports Association

National sports organization (nso) for boccia. grass roots development to ensure elite athletes compete at events in the paralympic quadrennial. an athlete focused national organization administering and governing sport opportunities…

—
9
Ontario Cerebral Palsy Sports Association

OCPSA assists athletes with cerebral palsy and related physical disabilities develop through sport from grass roots to high performance. OCPSA provides recreational and competitive opportunities regionally provincially and nationally.…

—
10
Paralympic Sports Association

Sledge Hockey Wheelchair floor hockey Adapted swimming Taekwondo Paracycling Adapted paddling Para Nordic Skiing Wheelchair Basketball Integrated spin adapted golfing boccia Programs expansion

—
11
Sport By Ability Niagara Inc
—
12
Paralympic Foundation of Canada

The Paralympic Foundation of Canada's (the 'Foundation') mission is together deliver the best prepared teams for games excellence while promoting inclusive communities through the power of sport and its ambition is to raise $35 Million by…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Canada and the most unlike its peers is The University of Western Ontario. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO — C$3,844,713 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CANADA — C$3,753,523 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS BRITISH COLUMBIA — C$1,293,188 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ALBERTA — C$1,125,676 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO — C$1,100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MANITOBA — C$654,496 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NOVA SCOTIA — C$448,724 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetOLYMPIQUES SPECIAUX QUEBEC — C$345,924 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SASKATCHEWAN — C$189,763 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND — C$149,322 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW BRUNSWICK — C$30,308 over 3y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ONTARIO ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS BRITISH COLUMBIA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ALBERTA ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NOVA SCOTIA ↗
  • Who funds OLYMPIQUES SPECIAUX QUEBEC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW BRUNSWICK ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Special Olympics CanadaON11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Special Olympics Canada · Healthier Tomorrows Individual Giving Program · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Aqueduct Foundation · Doane Grant Thornton Foundation · The Calgary Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 869562041:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canadian Special Olympics’ filings →