Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Public foundation

Canadian Olympic Foundation/ Fondation Olympique Canadienne

The canadian olympic foundation receives accumulates and distributes funds to the canadian high performance sport excellence programs of the canadian olympic committee and other organizations that support high performance sport activities.

C$7.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
159
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$4.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 159 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k50 grants · C$396k
  • C$10k–50k94 grants · C$1.6M
  • C$50k–250k12 grants · C$1.3M
  • C$250k+3 grants · C$4.7M
C$10,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEEC$4,059,750
SAIL CANADAC$350,000
EQUINE CANADAC$258,772
CANADA BASKETBALLC$210,000
PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$209,500
CANADA GAMES COUNCILC$160,000
FONDATION SKI CANADA FOUNDATIONC$115,547
CANADIAN CYCLING ASSOCIATIONC$105,000
CANADIAN AMATEUR ROWING ASSOCIATIONC$105,000
CANADIAN FREESTYLE SKI ASSOCIATIONC$75,000
CANADIAN RUGBY UNIONC$75,000
SPEED SKATING CANADAC$67,500
CANOE KAYAK CANADAC$67,500
CANADIAN GYMNASTICS FEDERATIONC$60,000
FEDERATION OF CANADIAN ARCHERSC$58,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Which regions your grants reach

Ontario
C$43M
Alberta
C$7.8M
British Columbia
C$7.2M
Quebec
C$1.0M
Manitoba
C$155k
Nova Scotia
C$104k
Saskatchewan
C$50k
Nunavut
C$1k
Yukon
C$1k
Northwest Territories
C$1k

Grants placed by each grantee’s location, read from the T3010 filings.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$57M · 53 repeat orgsC$5.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +213% since the first grant, against +202% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
40

Total granted

C$57M
C$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+213%
+202%

Still filing today

2%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$22M
  • AC
    ALPINE CANADA
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$2.5M
  • CF
    CANADIAN FREESTYLE SKI ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2.3M

Funded once

  • CC
    CAANADIAN CYCLING ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · C$381k
  • SC
    SAIL CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$249k
  • AC
    ALPINE CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$233k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARALYMPIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$234,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSPIRIT NORTH — C$25,740 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEGALE CANADA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSKI CANADA FOUNDATION — C$3,946 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetARCTIC CHILDREN AND YOUTH FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whistler Blackcomb Foundation SocietyBC11.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whistler Blackcomb Foundation Society · The Andy and Beth Burgess Family Foundation · The Calgary Foundation · The Andrew Mahon Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · CIBC Foundation / Fondation CIBC · The Edmonton Community Foundation Priv Act · United Way of Calgary and Area · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Toronto Foundation · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 817729346:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canadian Olympic Foundation/ Fondation Olympique Canadienne’s filings →