Etobicoke, ON · Charitable organization
Canadian Italian Business and Professional Association Ladie
The charity held its annual moda in motion fashion show fundraiser in support of Elspeth Heyworth Centre For Women which provides a safe haven for women in abusive situations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k13 grants · C$13k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELSPETH HAYWRTH CENTRE FOR WOMEN | C$80,000 |
| C.I.B.P.A. EDUCATION FOUNDATION | C$2,500 |
| SISTERING | C$2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,500 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES | C$1,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | C$1,000 |
| THE SCOTT MISSION | C$1,000 |
| CIBPA EDUCATION FUNDS | C$1,000 |
| CIBPA - TORONTO | C$750 |
| THE SCOTT MISSION | C$500 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES | C$500 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | C$500 |
| DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK | C$500 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$280 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 42% of grant dollars (C$163k). The 58% that went abroad (C$226k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 58% of all-years giving (C$226k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$83k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- VCVilla Colombo, Ladies' Auxiliary2× · 2018–2020 · C$8k
- CXChum X-Mas Wish Campaign3× · 2018–2020 · C$6k
- DBDaily Bread Food Bank6× · 2017–2024 · C$5k
Funded once
- GMG. Magnotta Foundationone grant, 2023 · C$125k · revenue -65%
- CCCOLORECTRAL CANCER RESOURCE NETWORKone grant, 2019 · C$75k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · C$25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.