Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Canadian Foundation for AIDS Research/Fondation Canadienne de Recherche Sur le Sida

Providing funding for top quality hiv research projects by canadian researchers and institutions related to all aspects of hiv and aids including; prevention treatment care and cure.

C$330k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$200k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$130k
C$40,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE - MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTHC$80,000
PROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE RESEARCHC$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIAC$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIAC$40,000
CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITE DE MONTREALC$40,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITYC$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWAC$40,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 86% of grant dollars (C$2.4M). The 14% that went abroad (C$380k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 14% of all-years giving (C$380k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.5M · 9 repeat orgsC$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

C$1.5M
C$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+27%

Still filing today

78%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Toronto
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$354k · revenue +43%
  • RU
    RYERSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$200k · revenue +32%
  • UO
    University of Ottawa
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$160k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNITY HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$400k · revenue +27% · 31% of their budget
  • RU
    Ryerson University
    one grant, 2017 · C$100k
  • CI
    CANADIAN INSTITUES FOR HEALTH RESEARCH
    one grant, 2018 · C$80k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
2
Carleton University

Carleton University provides post-secondary education.

—
3
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
4
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
5
Universite Du Quebec

Enseignement et recherche universitaire

—
6
The University of Lethbridge

The University of Lethbridge educates at a post-secondary level in both Lethbridge and Calgary at undergraduate and graduate levels. The University conducts research in the Faculty of Arts and Science Business Fine Arts Education Health…

—
7
Saint Mary's University

Saint Mary’s University is one of Canada’s top primarily undergraduate universities known for its international collaborations leadership in entrepreneurship and research that benefits local and global communities. We provide undergraduate…

—
8
University of Prince Edward Island

Post-Secondary Education

—
9
Universite De Moncton

Programmes d'enseignement post-secondaire et de recherche

—
10
University of Waterloo

The pursuit of learning through scholarship teaching and research.

—
11
The University of Winnipeg

Providing education

—
12
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'Institut de Recherche du Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre and the most unlike its peers is Women's College Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITY HEALTH — C$400,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetUniversity of Toronto — C$354,205 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRYERSON UNIVERSITY — C$200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Ottawa — C$160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMcGill University — C$159,820 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE RESEARCH — C$150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA — C$104,947 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESEARCH INSTITUTE - MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH — C$80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS COLLEGE HOSPITAL — C$67,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA — C$65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HEALTH FOUNDATION (PROVIDENCE HEALTHCARE) — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$40,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetSIMON FRASER UNIVERSIETY — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRESCIA UNIVERSITY — C$40,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetUNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Western Ontario — C$10,216 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kidney Foundation of Canada / la Fondation Canadienne Du ReinQC8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kidney Foundation of Canada / la Fondation Canadienne Du Rein · BenefAction Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 118831437:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canadian Foundation for AIDS Research/Fondation Canadienne de Recherche Sur le Sida’s filings →