Oakville, ON · Charitable organization
Canadian Coptic Medical Association
Medical treatment medicines and operations for poor people and donations for needy people and hospitals and charities in egypt sudan and other developing countries with under privileged communities
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k8 grants · C$14k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$26k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$307k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METEROPOLITAN BIEMEN NAQADA & QUOS DIOCESE | C$306,545 |
| EVANGELICAL MISSION HOSPITAL AL GARMANLYA | C$15,514 |
| MARINA MEDICAL CENTER | C$10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CANADIAN COPTIC FUND | C$5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$2,955 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,850 |
| ANBA BARSOUM ELARIAN HOSPITAL CHARITY | C$1,000 |
| HERPUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | C$970 |
| HELWAN AND ELMASARA BISHOP | C$850 |
| THE SHEPHERD AND MOTHER OF LIGHT | C$830 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL | C$570 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 17% of grant dollars (C$113k). The 83% that went abroad (C$540k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 83% of all-years giving (C$540k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$344k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AAANBA ABRAAM'S CHARITY4× · 2019–2022 · C$64k · revenue +85%
- ABANBA BARSOUM ELARIAN HOSPITAL CHARITY4× · 2020–2024 · C$35k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2022 · C$34k
Funded once
- TCTHE CHURCH OF POPE KYRILLOS VIN OLD CAIROone grant, 2020 · C$20k
- TCTHE COPTIC HOPE SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$15k
- VMVIGIN MARY ABU SHEFIN CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.