Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Canada's Walk of Fame - Allée Des Célébrités Canadiennes

Canada's walk of fame ('cwof') - rbc emerging artist program.

C$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$250
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADAC$20,000
CANADA GIVESC$10,000
CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTHC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$31k · 4 repeat orgsC$112k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +183% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

C$31k
C$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+183%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UB
    Unison Benevolent Fund
    2× · 2018–2022 · C$15k · revenue +317%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$10k · revenue +10%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$5k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MB
    MISSION BON ACCUEIL
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +7%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO BANTING & BEST DIABETES CENTRE
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +13%
  • FL
    FONDATION LAURENT DUVERNAY-TARDIFgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Brain Canada / Brain Canada Foundation

Brain canada is a national non-profit organization that enables and supports excellent innovative paradigm-changine brain research in canada. it plays a unique and invaluable role as the national convener of the brain research community.…

—
2
Grand Challenges Canada Foundation
—
3
Banting Discovery Foundation Fondation Banting pour la Découverte
—
4
Mental Health Research Canada/Recherche En Sante Mentale Canada

Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC) is a national charitable organization that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Canadians by advancing mental health knowledge. Our vision is to create a Canada with better mental health for all…

—
5
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
6
Canadian Health Foundation
—
7
The Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research

The canadian foundation for dietetic research (cfdr) was created by dietitians of canada (dc) the professional association for dietitians and incorporated in 1991 as a charitable foundation. our mandate: enhancing the health of canadians…

—
8
Canadian Sport Foundation Fondation canadienne de sport

We deepen public understanding of a selection of intellectual topics in sport and educate the public about them.

—
9
International Development Research Centre

Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…

—
10
Canadian Disability Foundation

The Canadian Disability Foundation ('CDF') is Canada’s national disability organization. Established to provide philanthropic support services and innovative social solutions CDF helps the more than 8 million disabled Canadians to be…

—
11
Mitocanada Foundation

We are canada’s only not-for-profit organization focused on mitochondrial disease. our mission is to transform the outlook for persons facing a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease and/or dysfunction. we do this by 1) raising awareness 2)…

—
12
Canada West Foundation

The canada west foundation is an independent non-partisan public policy think tank that focuses on the policies that shape the west and by extension canada. through our evidence-based research and commentary we provide practical solutions…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Foundation for Aids Research/Fondation Canadienne De Recherche Sur Le Sida and the most unlike its peers is Sir Frederick Banting Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnison Benevolent Fund — C$15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — C$10,255 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION BON ACCUEIL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO BANTING & BEST DIABETES CENTRE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION LAURENT DUVERNAY-TARDIF — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANADA GIVES — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mike Weir Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CANADIAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION — C$5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH — C$5,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SARAH MCLAUGHLAN FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSEEDCHANGE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIR FREDERICK BANTING LEGACY FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetWATER FIRST EDUCATION AND TRAINING — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE MANITOBA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LONDON FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadaHelps — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conam Charitable Foun…Cidel FoundationCanada GivesAqueduct FoundationNicola Wealth Private…BenefAction FoundationToronto FoundationPrivate Giving Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way East Ontar…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…
Conam Charitable FoundationON8.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conam Charitable Foundation · Cidel Foundation · Canada Gives · Aqueduct Foundation · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Toronto Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 889896924:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canada's Walk of Fame - Allée Des Célébrités Canadiennes’ filings →