Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Canada Company: Many Ways to Serve

CANADA COMPANY: MANY WAYS TO SERVE is a nationally recognized non partisan charitable organization comprised fo over 600 business and community leaders who work together to support the men an women of the canadian armed forces and their families.

C$152k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$70k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$22k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$130k
C$60,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP MAPLE LEAFC$70,000
THE PERLEY AND RIDEAU VETERAN'S HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATIONC$60,000
SUPPORT OUR TROOPSC$22,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 79% of grant dollars (C$346k). The 21% that went abroad (C$91k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 21% of all-years giving (C$91k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$252k · 3 repeat orgsC$184k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +407% since the first grant, against +78% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

C$252k
C$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+407%
+78%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CAMP MAPLE LEAF
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$90k · revenue +407%
  • TP
    THE PERLEY AND RIDEAU VETERAN'S HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$90k · revenue +119%
  • SO
    SUPPORT OUR TROOPS
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$72k

Funded once

  • NC
    National Capital Open to Support Our Troops
    one grant, 2017 · C$61k
  • HC
    Hamilton Community Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue +189%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP MAPLE LEAF — C$90,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetTHE PERLEY AND RIDEAU VETERAN'S HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$90,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHamilton Community Foundation — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPetawawa Military Family Resource Centre — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFondation du Centre de la Famille Valcarter — C$12,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetConference of Defence Associations — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way East Ontar…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'OntarioON5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 838516094:2021-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Canada Company: Many Ways to Serve’s filings →