Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Kentville, NS · Public foundation

Campaign for Kids Foundation

Support for principals fund- each year we make $800 available to each elementary and middle school within our country.

C$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$23k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$23k
C$2,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$135k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNAPOLIS VALLEY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONC$23,148
HOLLAND COLLEGEC$2,000
BERWICK FOOD BANKC$500
UPPER ROOM FOOD BANKC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$155k · 3 repeat orgsC$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

C$155k
C$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AV
    ANNAPOLIS VALLEY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$143k · revenue -100%
  • UR
    UPPER ROOM FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +61%
  • BF
    BERWICK FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +334%

Funded once

  • FI
    FUNDY INTERCHURCH FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +4%
  • CH
    CHRYSALIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -50%
  • WA
    WOLFVILLE AREA INTERCHURCH COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weymouth Area Food Bank

Provides food for people in need

—
2
Northumberland County Foodbanks

Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

—
3
Arthur Food Bank

To provide a 3 day emergency food supply to clients within the arthur community

—
4
Annapolis Area Food Bank Society

To feed families in need in the annapolis royal catchment area

—
5
Rossland Food Bank

Dispensing food

—
6
The Hantsport and Area Community Food Bank Society

Provide food for needy people in our catchment area. we also give out emergency baskets of food as well s extra food at christmas & for the summer.

—
7
Dorchester Community Volunteer Action

Food bank

—
8
Kensington and Area Food Bank

Provide good quality food to people in area who can't afford to buy food. (food bank)

—
9
West Nipissing Food Bank

Food purchase for anyone in need

—
10
Pictou County Food Bank

Provide emergency food to those in need located in pictou county nova scotia

—
11
Stittsville Food Bank

Food bank

—
12
East Dartmouth Christian Food Bank Association

Distribution of food to individuals experiencing food insecurity.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolfville Area Interchurch Council and the most unlike its peers is Holland College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANNAPOLIS VALLEY REGIONAL CENTRE FOR EDUCATION — C$143,478 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetUPPER ROOM FOOD BANK — C$6,750 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetBERWICK FOOD BANK — C$5,250 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetFUNDY INTERCHURCH FOOD BANK — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOLFVILLE AREA INTERCHURCH COUNCIL — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANNING AREA FOOD BANK — C$3,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHOLLAND COLLEGE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA SCOTIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Rising Sun St. Joseph's Catholic Church — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Salvation Army — C$670 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feed Nova Scotia Soci…The Community Foundat…United Way Maritimes/…White Rock Community …Ourhouse SocietyPort Williams Health …E K M Health Foundati…14 Wing Combined Char…United Way of Colches…Food Banks Canada/Ban…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
Feed Nova Scotia SocietyNS9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feed Nova Scotia Society · The Community Foundation of Nova Scotia Society · United Way Maritimes/Centraide des Maritimes · White Rock Community Association · Ourhouse Society · Port Williams Health Auxiliary · E K M Health Foundation · 14 Wing Combined Charities · United Way of Colchester County · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 872517123:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Campaign for Kids’ filings →