Skip to content

Loon Lake, SK · Charitable organization

Calvary United Church

Church services charitable donations made to human aid organizations

C$840
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$540
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$540
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAN INTERNATIONALC$540
WASKOOSIS SAFE SHELTERC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$25k · 8 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

C$25k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MISSION & SERVICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$16k
  • PI
    PLAN INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +13%
  • SA
    ST. ANDREWS COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue -10%

Funded once

  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · C$600 · revenue -47%
  • LL
    LOON LAKE SPECIAL CARE HOME
    one grant, 2022 · C$550
  • ML
    MEADOW LAKE HOMEPLATE SHELTER
    one grant, 2023 · C$500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
2
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
3
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
4
Pih Partners in Health Canada

Partners In Health Canada works in partnership with sister organizations in settings of poverty around the world to bring health and social justice to vulnerable and marginalized communities. We deliver high quality comprehensive health…

—
5
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
6
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
7
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—
8
Macklin & District Health Foundation Inc.

Raise money and manage a fund to assist with health related expenditures in the Macklin SK area such as purchase medical equipment building projects and renovations medical personnel recruitment and training and public information.…

—
9
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research

—
10
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
11
International Development Assistance Society of Canada

Raise funds to support health education and awareness to people living in rural areas in other developing countries.

—
12
Jim Pattison Children's Hospital Foundation Inc.

The Foundation's purpose is to raise funds for the enhancement of children's and maternal healthcare in Saskatchewan and the Jim Pattison Children's Hospital. The Foundation is a proud member of Canada's Children's Hospital Foundation…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kinsmen Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is United Church St. Andrew's College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL — C$4,140 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST. ANDREWS COLLEGE — C$2,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRED CROSS — C$600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEADOW LAKE HOMEPLATE SHELTER — C$500 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetLEPROSY RELIEF — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOOK LAKE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — C$250 over 3y, 67% of budgetTELEMIRACLE — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNW SCHOOL DIVISION SCHOLARSHIP FUND — C$200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSASKATOON CANCER SOCIETY — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat For Humanity — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ST. ANDREWS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds MEADOW LAKE HOMEPLATE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds LEPROSY RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds LOON LAKE SPECIAL CARE HOME ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children ↗
  • Who funds LOOK LAKE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELEMIRACLE ↗
  • Who funds NW SCHOOL DIVISION SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds SASKATOON CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Habitat For Humanity ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC3.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118825835:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Calvary United Church’s filings →