Charlottetown, PE · Charitable organization
Calvary Temple Charlottetown Incorporated
Hold weekly worship services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$4k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DISTRICT OFFICE PAOC | C$30,000 |
| ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$1,650 |
| HARVEST HOUSE MINISTRIES | C$1,640 |
| UPPER ROOM FOOD BANK | C$925 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NONational Office PAOC6× · 2017–2022 · C$22k · revenue +22%
- HHHAVEST HOUSE MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +41%
- RWRehabilitation & Wellness Centre of Naomi &Ruth Ltd3× · 2018–2020 · C$2k · revenue +208%
Funded once
- CCCampus Church Bayviewone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -90%
- BGBilly Graham Evangelistic Assn of Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -3%
- WWATOTOone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Missionary training -bible studies
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Religious prison ministries bible study courses
Website to inform and educate A variety of classes across Canada to inform and educate churches and church leaders Consulting and coaching services to aid in training and educating of churches and church leaders
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan's Purse - Canada and the most unlike its peers is Campus Church Bayview. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DISTRICT OFFICE PAOC ↗
- Who funds National Office PAOC ↗
- Who funds HAVEST HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Campus Church Bayview ↗
- Who funds Billy Graham Evangelistic Assn of Canada ↗
- Who funds WATOTO ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre of Naomi &Ruth Ltd ↗
- Who funds ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION D'EGLISES BAPTISTES EVENGELIQUES AU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds UPPER ROOM FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Master College & Seminary ↗
- Who funds Alpha Ministries Canada ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds Samitans Purse ↗
- Who funds The Gideons ↗
- Who funds Jews For Jesus ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kings Church · Canada Donates Inc. · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.