Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Vancouver, BC · Private foundation

Cadence Cares Foundation

It made gifts to qualified donees.

C$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$9,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMBIA STELLA ALLIANCE SOCIETYC$9,500
AMP IT UP FOUNDATIONC$2,500
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Sitka Foundation

The foundation receives and manages funds for the exclusive purpose of making gifts to qualified donees as defined by the income tax act. selected qualified donees support the conservation of nature and the protection of biodiversity and…

—
2
Child Aid International Fund Society

Making Gifts to Qualified Donees

—
3
Stem Camp Foundation

advancement of education

—
4
Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation

Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation was created to seek sources of gifts to fund a program of grantmaking to qualified donees other than private foundations. It is dedicated to helping donors increase and sustain their charitable giving…

—
5
The Samuel and Saidye Bronfman Family Foundation

The foundation provides funds to qualified donees that are focused on social cultural and environmental programs

—
6
Foundation for Public Good

Making gifts to qualified donees

—
7
Cannonball Foundation

The Foundation identifies and provides gifts to qualified donees which focus on providing access to financially disadvantaged people in the areas of education music and sport participation.

—
8
Praxis Foundation

It made gifts to qualified donees.

—
9
Himalaya Foundation

The foundation provides funds to organizations that support the relief of poverty advance education and otherwise benefit the disadvantaged population of the world.

—
10
Cal Bombay Foundation

To support agencies specializing in agriculture in Africa.

—
11
Canary Foundation

The Foundation collects and administers funds in order to distribute funds to qualified donees.

—
12
Gluskin Sheff Foundation for Philanthropy

The charity solicits donations for the purpose of establishing funds and donor advised ( planned giving) programs which in turn provide gifts to qualified donees.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chimp: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) and the most unlike its peers is The Grove Retreat Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAga Khan Foundation — C$136,594 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPriority Foundation — C$52,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSimpson Community Development Society — C$30,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER VANCOUVER — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBritish Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImladris Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetPine Knoll Publications Educational Society — C$8,579 over 1y, 29% of budgetIgnatov Family Foundation — C$6,532 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEASTER SEALS CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHIMP: CHARITABLE IMPACT FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMP IT UP FOUNDATION — C$2,500 over 1y, 29% of budgetCanucks Autism Network — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreate Change Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

CHIMP: Charitable Imp…
CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-05-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 804962652:2024-05-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Cadence Cares’ filings →