Terra Cotta, ON · Charitable organization
Burr Foundation
Alleviate animal suffering animal and wildlife rescue
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAM | C$600 |
| NINTH LIFE CAT RESCUE OF ONTARIO | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAM3× · 2017–2019 · C$2k · revenue +169%
- AVASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY2× · 2017–2018 · C$490 · revenue +244%
- TWTORONTO WILFLIFE CENTRE2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +143%
Funded once
- SOSongbirds Only Avian Rehabilitationone grant, 2017 · C$500
- ZCZoocheck Canadagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue ×15
- FSFondation SPCA Montréal / Montréal SPCA Foundationone grant, 2017 · C$100 · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care of animals
Ontario Reptile Rescue is an animal rescue servicing Ontario. We rescue rehabilitate and re-home reptiles amphibians and other similar exotic pets. We also provide educational information for the public and promote the proper care and…
NWC is focused on helping sick injured and orphaned native wildlife species through wildlife medical care rehabilitation & training. More than 500 animals were seen for medical treatment over the past year and most were released by…
Helping animals get rescued rehabilitated and released when they are injured or orphaned.
The Rock Wildlife Rescue cares for injured orphaned sick and displaced wildlife. Many of those animals are in distress as a direct result of human activity. As part of our mandate we provide education for habitat protection and…
We rehabiliate injured orphanes or ill wildlife in northeastern ontario. we also provide information on wildlife on wildlife issues and assist in (non-invasive) wildlife research.
Rescue rehabilitation release orphaned and injuried wildlife
Animal rehabilitation
Education on wildlife natural history rehabilitation coexistence and resolving issues Rehabilitation for injured and orphaned wild mammals
Rescue and rehabilitate injured and orphaned wild animals and birds in the province of manitoba for release to the wild.
Care of injured & orphaned native wildlife under conditions set out under wildlife custodian licence (ontario) & federal permit by canadian wildlife service.
Rehabilitation Of Wildlife As Per The Rules And Regulations Of The Ministry Of The Environment For Release Back Into The Wild.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Animal Protection Canada Protection Mondiale des Animaux Canada and the most unlike its peers is Marc Ouellette. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds TORONTO WILFLIFE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds Zoocheck Canada ↗
- Who funds The Northern Ontario Animal Welfare Society ↗
- Who funds WOODLANDS WILDLIFE SANCUTARY ↗
- Who funds NINTH LIFE CAT RESCUE OF ONTARIO ↗
- Who funds Fondation SPCA Montréal / Montréal SPCA Foundation ↗
- Who funds World Society for the Protection of Animals ↗
- Who funds LITTLE RES Q ↗
- Who funds SHADES OF HOPE WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · BenefAction Foundation · United Way Simcoe Muskoka · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Canada Gives · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · The Calgary Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.