Skip to content

Terra Cotta, ON · Charitable organization

Burr Foundation

Alleviate animal suffering animal and wildlife rescue

C$700
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$600
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$600
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAMC$600
NINTH LIFE CAT RESCUE OF ONTARIOC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 5 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

C$3k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+213%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAM
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$2k · revenue +169%
  • AV
    ASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$490 · revenue +244%
  • TW
    TORONTO WILFLIFE CENTRE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • SO
    Songbirds Only Avian Rehabilitation
    one grant, 2017 · C$500
  • ZC
    Zoocheck Canadagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue ×15
  • FS
    Fondation SPCA Montréal / Montréal SPCA Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$100 · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wild At Heart Refuge Centre

Care of animals

—
2
Ontario Reptile Rescue

Ontario Reptile Rescue is an animal rescue servicing Ontario. We rescue rehabilitate and re-home reptiles amphibians and other similar exotic pets. We also provide educational information for the public and promote the proper care and…

—
3
National Wildlife Centre

NWC is focused on helping sick injured and orphaned native wildlife species through wildlife medical care rehabilitation & training. More than 500 animals were seen for medical treatment over the past year and most were released by…

—
4
Wild Things Rehabilitation Society

Helping animals get rescued rehabilitated and released when they are injured or orphaned.

—
5
The Rock Wildlife Rescue Inc.

The Rock Wildlife Rescue cares for injured orphaned sick and displaced wildlife. Many of those animals are in distress as a direct result of human activity. As part of our mandate we provide education for habitat protection and…

—
6
Turtle Pond Wildlife Centre

We rehabiliate injured orphanes or ill wildlife in northeastern ontario. we also provide information on wildlife on wildlife issues and assist in (non-invasive) wildlife research.

—
7
Procyon Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Centre

Rescue rehabilitation release orphaned and injuried wildlife

—
8
Bandit Ranch Rehab

Animal rehabilitation

—
9
Holly's Haven Wildlife Rescue

Education on wildlife natural history rehabilitation coexistence and resolving issues Rehabilitation for injured and orphaned wild mammals

—
10
Wildlife Rescue Network Inc.

Rescue and rehabilitate injured and orphaned wild animals and birds in the province of manitoba for release to the wild.

—
11
Iggy's Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre (Ontario)

Care of injured & orphaned native wildlife under conditions set out under wildlife custodian licence (ontario) & federal permit by canadian wildlife service.

—
12
Moose Mountain R N R Wildlife Rehabilitation Inc.

Rehabilitation Of Wildlife As Per The Rules And Regulations Of The Ministry Of The Environment For Release Back Into The Wild.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Animal Protection Canada Protection Mondiale des Animaux Canada and the most unlike its peers is Marc Ouellette. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPEAKING OF DOGS RESCUE PROGRAM — C$1,550 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY — C$490 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO WILFLIFE CENTRE — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZoocheck Canada — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Northern Ontario Animal Welfare Society — C$200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOODLANDS WILDLIFE SANCUTARY — C$150 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNINTH LIFE CAT RESCUE OF ONTARIO — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation SPCA Montréal / Montréal SPCA Foundation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Society for the Protection of Animals — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE RES Q — C$100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHADES OF HOPE WILDLIFE REFUGE — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Golden HorseshoeON8.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · BenefAction Foundation · United Way Simcoe Muskoka · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Canada Gives · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · The Calgary Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under animal welfare.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2020) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 897926135:2019-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Burr’s filings →