Skip to content

Burnt River, ON · Charitable organization

Burnt River Charge of the United Church

Selling cookbooks bake & yardsale and craft sale

C$133
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$100
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINMOUNT FOOD BANKC$100
Individual grant recipientC$33
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 64% of grant dollars (C$2k). The 36% that went abroad (C$1k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 36% of all-years giving (C$1k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1k · 3 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$1k
C$2k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Breakfast Club Ridgewood Public School
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k
  • KF
    Kinmount Food Bank
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$300
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$66

Funded once

  • UC
    United Church Mission & Service
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k
  • UC
    United Church Mission & Services Fund
    one grant, 2017 · C$942 · revenue +22%
  • CF
    Coboconk Food Bank
    one grant, 2017 · C$200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church Mission & Services Fund — C$942 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church Mission & Services Fund ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118821867:2019-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Burnt River Charge of the United Church’s filings →