Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Thornhill, ON · Charitable organization

Building a Jewish Tomorrow

Youth groups independent schools and boards cultural programs and place of worship.

C$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
C$250
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAHC$11,736
BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATIONC$3,200
CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM FOR ISRAELC$1,015
PRIORITY-1 OUTREACH PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR JUDAISMC$250
BIKUR CHOLIMC$130
THE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLELC$120
YESHIVA KESER TORAHC$120
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$48k · 3 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

C$48k
C$780

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+701%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$25k · revenue +255%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$12k · revenue +106%
  • BA
    BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$10k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FUTURES OF ONTARIOgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$540 · revenue +701%
  • ZB
    ZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · C$240 · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
2
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
3
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
4
Yedidut Torah Foundation

The foundation operates programs to promote religious study and foster successful religious outreach.

—
5
Friends of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah

Initiatives that advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith

—
6
Beth Oloth Charitable Organization

To stimulate interest in providing higher jewish education and jewish religious training for the perpetuation of the jewish religion and the training of teachers of jewish religion.

—
7
Young Jewish Professionals

Provide classes and seminars to jeiwsh professionals in the areas of jewish religious tenents doctrines and observances

—
8
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
9
Beit Midrash Zichron Dov

The purpose of the organization is to provide torah education and leadership training for rabinical students who embrace the values of torah mitizion and yeshiva university and to promote these values to the jewish youth collegiates women…

—
10
Ohr Torah
—
11
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
12
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toronto Sephardic Kollel and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Magen David Adom for Israel/Magen David Adom Canadien Pour Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH — C$12,436 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION — C$10,240 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM FOR ISRAEL — C$1,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUTURES OF ONTARIO — C$540 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetPRIORITY-1 OUTREACH PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR JUDAISM — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION — C$240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KESER TORAH — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Friedberg Charita…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…Zolty Charitable Foun…My Charity FundMoral Arc FoundationRayjo Charitable TrustOhr Chaya Charitable …Social Services and C…The Meyer and Idelle …Shainhouse Family Cha…J.Frankel Family Char…The Jewish Legacy Cha…
The Friedberg Charitable FoundationON10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Ohr Chaya Charitable Organization · Social Services and Communal Matters Fund · The Meyer and Idelle Weinstock Charitable Foundation · Shainhouse Family Charitable Foundation · J.Frankel Family Charitable Trust · The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 896717352:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Building a Jewish Tomorrow’s filings →