Port Elgin, ON · Public foundation
Bruce County Conservationists
Receive and maintain funds and apply all or part of the principle and income therefrom, from time to time, to charitable organizations that are also registered charities under the income tax act.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bluewater School Board | C$2,800 |
| Kincardine and Community health | C$1,000 |
| Tara area food bank | C$1,000 |
| Saugeen Memorial Hospital | C$1,000 |
| Paisley Missionary Church | C$1,000 |
| Prance | C$800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- B(B.W.D.S.B. (Eat & Learn, Scholarship)3× · 2017–2019 · C$9k · revenue +46%
- TATara Area Food Bank3× · 2017–2019 · C$4k · revenue +69% · 27% of their budget
- PIPaisley Immanuel Evangelical Missionary Church3× · 2017–2019 · C$4k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- JCJumpstart - CTCone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +6%
- KCKincardine Community Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue +322%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Funded Capital Purchases and Expenditures for Sea-to-Sky community health
Bluewater Health Foundation raises funds for the hospital group known as Bluewater Health. These funds are spent on capital projects and to facilitate the acquisition of leading edge equipment and technology and the provision of programs…
Fundraising through gift shop sales atm fees lottery etc
Raised funds by operating an auction mail soliciations and other events. received donations from businesses and individuals. funds were donated to grey bruce health services for the purchase of medical equipment capital improvements and…
To raise funds for the kemptville district hospital for capital equipment renovations and plant expansion.
Assist with purchase of necessary equipment for our health care facilities in ponoka and area
The charity manages the property previously known as the kincaid union hospital on behalf of the villages of kincaid meyronne and hazenmore as well as the rm of pinto creek no. 75.
Fundraising to purchase various equipment needs for the glace bay general hopsital
Funding the purchase of hospital equipment.
Kootenay lake hospital foundation raises funds to purchase priority medical equipment for the kootenay lake hospital
South Bruce Grey Health Centre (SBGHC) is a dynamic multi-site health care organization serving four rural communities in southern Grey and Bruce Counties. Each of our hospital sites offer acute care services a 24-7 emergency department…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kincardine and Community Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pegasus Riding Association Nurturing Challenged Equestrians. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds B.W.D.S.B. (Eat & Learn, Scholarship) ↗
- Who funds Tara Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Paisley Immanuel Evangelical Missionary Church ↗
- Who funds Kincardine and Community health ↗
- Who funds Saugeen Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds PRANCE ↗
- Who funds Jumpstart - CTC ↗
- Who funds Kincardine Community Services ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Bruce Grey · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Aqueduct Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.