Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

Bristol Areospace Limited Employees Charitable Fund

Employee Source Deductions remitted to registered charities as per employee instructions.

C$11k
Granted FY2018
12
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$785
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$808
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETYC$1,732
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$1,665
HEART & STROKE FOUNDATION OF MBC$1,365
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MBC$1,000
SALVATION ARMYC$796
MILITARY FAMILY RESOURCEC$785
CHILDREN'S WISH FOUNDATION - MB CHAPTERC$756
CANADIAN DIABETES ASSOC. OF MBC$727
KIDNEY FOUNDATIONC$668
MANITOBA LUNG ASSOCIATIONC$516
UNITED WAY OF WINNIPEGC$458
ARTHRITIS SOCIETYC$239
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$13k · 7 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

C$13k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-4%

Still filing today

86%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Humane society
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +744%
  • CH
    Childrens Hospital of MB
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +47%
  • MF
    MILITARY FAMILY RESOURCE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CC
    CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -4%
  • HS
    HEART & STROKE FOUNDATION OF MB
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue -4%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · C$796

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Lung Association - Association Pulmonaire Du Canada

Provide fellowships studentships and other awards for research on issues related to respiratory health as conducted through universities and other research facilities throughout Canada. Offer support to individuals with lung health issues…

—
2
CancerCare Manitoba

Cancercare manitoba maintains and co-ordinates a province-wide program for cancer prevention diagnosis treatment education and research.

—
3
Hypertension Canada

Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…

—
4
Lung Saskatchewan Inc.

1. Our general role is to improve respiratory health through programs education research training treatment and prevention of lung disease and promotion of a healthy environment and healthy lifestyles. 2.We promote tobacco use reduction…

—
5
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

1) medical surgical and psychiatric healthcare. 2) medical research

—
6
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
7
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
8
Diabetes Foundation of Manitoba Inc.

research

—
9
Canadian Myeloma Research Group

In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…

—
10
Mental Health Research Canada/Recherche En Sante Mentale Canada

Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC) is a national charitable organization that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Canadians by advancing mental health knowledge. Our vision is to create a Canada with better mental health for all…

—
11
Lupus Society of Manitoba Inc

Programs to establish a support system to individuals and their families in Manitoba who are affected by Lupus. Provision of a telephone service giving information and advice to callers. Publishing a newsletter providing information to…

—
12
The Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research

The canadian foundation for dietetic research (cfdr) was created by dietitians of canada (dc) the professional association for dietitians and incorporated in 1991 as a charitable foundation. our mandate: enhancing the health of canadians…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Fondation Des Maladies Du Coeur Et De L'avc Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Winnipeg Military Family Resource Centre Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHumane society — C$3,464 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildrens Hospital of MB — C$2,314 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$1,665 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Diabetes Assc of MB — C$1,537 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY RESOURCE — C$1,448 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART & STROKE FOUNDATION OF MB — C$1,365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManitoba Lung Association — C$1,206 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetArthritis society — C$614 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Source object 890947377:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bristol Areospace Limited Employees’ filings →