Skip to content

Bridgewater, NS · Charitable organization

Bridgewater Pastoral Charge

We provide a place of worship for a congregation of 270 families we provide facilities for all church related activities and groups we provide space for a childrens daycare we support the local food bank program local mission & service projects boy scouts of canada we support and provide space for youth groups sunday school…

C$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$17k
C$2,105
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNITED CHURCH MISSION & SERVICEC$16,827
BRIDGEWATER FOOD BANKC$5,970
SHERBROOKE LAKE CAMPC$2,105
ANGEL TREE CHRISTMAS FAMILY DONATIONC$2,105
THIRD BRIDGEWATER GROUP COMMITTEE ( SCOUTS CANADA )C$265
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$252k · 8 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

C$252k
C$21k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$165k · revenue +22%
  • BF
    BRIDGEWATER FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$29k
  • SL
    SHERBROOKE LAKE CAMP
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$20k

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH MISSION & SERVICE
    one grant, 2022 · C$19k
  • LR
    LaHAVE RIVER REFUGEE PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k
  • TB
    THIRD BRIDGEWATER GROUP COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2018 · C$541

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUND — C$164,528 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGEWATER FOOD BANK — C$13,902 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetANGEL TREE CHRISTMAS FAMILY DONATION — C$7,239 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEWATER FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL TREE CHRISTMAS FAMILY DONATION ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 106810823:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bridgewater Pastoral Charge’s filings →