Skip to content

Lethbridge, AB · Charitable organization

Bridges of Hope International Network of Development Agencies Inc.

Orphan Sponsorship Education Medical Care providing clean water youth programs community outreach throughout the world.

C$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lethbridge Pregnancy CentreC$7,800
Youth With A MissionC$5,834
Via ChurchC$5,000
SABCC$5,000
Kootenay Christian AcademyC$5,000
Misericordia Fellowship Centre of LethbridgeC$5,000
Lethbridge Christian SchoolC$3,000
Lethbridge Food BankC$2,000
Crowsnest Community ChurchC$1,705
Individual grant recipientC$1,700
Interfaith Food BankC$1,000
Individual grant recipientC$1,000
Alliance ChurchC$739
Individual grant recipientC$250
Woods HomesC$244
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$41k · 3 repeat orgsC$139k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

C$41k
C$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Great Commission Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$20k · revenue +19%
  • MF
    Misericordia Fellowship of Lethbridge
    3× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +42%
  • PC
    Parallel Church
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$5k

Funded once

  • AG
    Ally Global Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · C$50k · revenue -30%
  • LF
    Lethbridge food Bank
    one grant, 2021 · C$18k · revenue +11%
  • SA
    Street Alivegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$13k · revenue +110%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
2
Brave Global Canada

Brave Global empowers local communities to partner with vulnerable girls to prevent sexual exploitation. They train local leaders offer curriculum and ongoing coaching and strategy to work towards ending trafficking.

—
3
Shelter Canada

Building houses for the needy in El Salvador. Day-to-day financial activity goes through The Great Commission Foundation.

—
4
Humanitarian Coalition /

The Humanitarian Coalition contributes towards alleviating acute human suffering among survivors of humanitarian disasters. As a joint Canadian approach to humanitarian response the Humanitarian Coalition is a 'one-stop-shop' for all…

—
5
AngelOne Canada

Conducts missionary work in the developing countries

—
6
Global Family Care Network (Gfcn) Inc. / Reseau Global de Soins Familiaux (Gfcn) Inc.

We promote public awareness in canada about the problems of sex trafficking and other forms of sexual exploitation of canadian children and youth through the dissemination of information. - we offer curriculum and coaching in canada to…

—
7
Give Foundation

Give Foundation enables people to make donations to registered Canadian charities in an efficient manner.

—
8
Cooperation Canada - Coopération Canada

Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…

—
9
Alliance Global Serve Canada

Canada: Provide cross cultural missionary training support outreach ministries to ethic groups and promote development of mission ministries in churches. Cambodia: Provide leadership development language training and youth outreach.…

—
10
Strategic Ministry Partnerships - Canada

Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing food and other necessities of life including access to education for children of families who are poor of low income or in need.

—
11
Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

All programs for the Canadian Online Giving Foundation were commenced in 2009. The purpose and mission of the Canadian Online Giving Foundation is to act as a donor advised fund whereby funds are aggregated and distributed to registered…

—
12
Mennonite Central Committee (Mcc) British Columbia

Forwards funds to Mennonite Central Committee Canada to support international relief. Warehouse collects and ships clothing/blankets/food/medical supplies to Mennonite Central Committee Canada for forwarding to other countries. Partners…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Great Commission Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ambrose University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAlly Global Foundation — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Great Commission Foundation — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLethbridge food Bank — C$17,677 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMisericordia Fellowship of Lethbridge — C$15,892 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetStreet Alive — C$12,677 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKootenay Christian Fellowship — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmbrose University — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWAM — C$2,687 over 1y, 96% of budgetDays for Girls Society — C$1,509 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ally Global Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Great Commission Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Lethbridge food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Misericordia Fellowship of Lethbridge ↗
  • Who funds Street Alive ↗
  • Who funds Kootenay Christian Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds Ambrose University ↗
  • Who funds YWAM ↗
  • Who funds Days for Girls Society ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 863616843:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bridges of Hope International Network of Development Agencies’ filings →