Coquitlam, BC · Charitable organization
Breakthrough Ministries International
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under C$10k16 grants · C$62k
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$78k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYER | C$26,000 |
| BE A HERO | C$18,873 |
| LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES | C$12,388 |
| GENERALS INTERNATIONAL | C$10,901 |
| HARVEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | C$10,000 |
| HARVEST INTERNATIONAL MINISTRY | C$6,450 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$6,282 |
| JOSEPH'S STOREHOUSE INC. | C$6,281 |
| CORNERSTONE CHURCH | C$6,194 |
| BILL JOHNSON MINISTRIES | C$6,194 |
| LOU ENGLE MINISTRIES | C$5,401 |
| FIRE AND RAIN MINISTRIES | C$4,515 |
| EXPECTED END MINISTRIES | C$4,410 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$3,140 |
| TAKE CHARGE MINISTRIES | C$3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 42% of grant dollars (C$59k). The 58% that went abroad (C$81k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 58% of all-years giving (C$81k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: V-Kol Media Ministries · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.