Skip to content

Calgary, AB · Public foundation

Branch Out Neurological Foundation

Annual Bike Tour Brain Change Initiative

C$278k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
—
Regions reached
C$140k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$130k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$140k
C$22,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$140,200
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANC$30,600
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTOC$22,000
UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORKC$22,000
SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTEC$22,000
UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIAC$19,800
UNITY HEALTH TORONTOC$14,000
THE CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MERC$7,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 75% of grant dollars (C$906k). The 25% that went abroad (C$300k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 25% of all-years giving (C$300k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$776k · 10 repeat orgsC$430k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

C$776k
C$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+32%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$169k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Calgary
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$209k · revenue +19%
  • UO
    University of Toronto
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$176k · revenue +34%
  • UO
    University of Lethbridge
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$78k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AC
    Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · C$100k · revenue +16%
  • UO
    University of Calgary
    one grant, 2021 · C$70k
  • HB
    Holland Bloorview Rehabilitation Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$22k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
2
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
3
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
4
Alberta University of the Arts

Post-secondary education in the field of visual art and design. alberta university of the arts (auarts) provides bachelor of fine arts bachelor of design and masters of fine arts programs.

—
5
University of British Columbia

Post Secondary Education & Research

—
6
The University of Winnipeg

Providing education

—
7
St Mary's University

St. Mary’s University is an independent Catholic University that provides innovative teaching and research and offers accredited degrees in Liberal Arts Sciences and Education. Located on a historic site in Calgary Alberta StMU inspires…

—
8
Saint Mary's University

Saint Mary’s University is one of Canada’s top primarily undergraduate universities known for its international collaborations leadership in entrepreneurship and research that benefits local and global communities. We provide undergraduate…

—
9
Board of Governors of the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology

Post secondary education and training in technology applied arts and trades.

—
10
University of Waterloo

The pursuit of learning through scholarship teaching and research.

—
11
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—
12
Yukon University

Facilitation and deliver of post-secondary education including northern research.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Governors of the University of Alberta and the most unlike its peers is Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Calgary — C$209,333 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Toronto — C$176,270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlberta Children's Hospital Foundation — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Lethbridge — C$78,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHolland Bloorview Rehabilitation Hospital — C$22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Victoria — C$16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Alberta — C$16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Saskatchewan — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Calgary ↗
  • Who funds University of Toronto ↗
  • Who funds Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Lethbridge ↗
  • Who funds Holland Bloorview Rehabilitation Hospital ↗
  • Who funds University of Victoria ↗
  • Who funds University of Alberta ↗
  • Who funds University of Saskatchewan ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 815812284:2022-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Branch Out Neurological’s filings →