Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Blossom Foundation

Promotion and development of charitable purposes particularly for care maintenance education training and well-being of needy children in sub-saharan africa excluding south africa.

C$709k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$86k
  • C$50k–250k7 grants · C$606k
C$50,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIH PARTNERS IN HEALTH CANADAC$150,000
FRIENDS OF AMANI CANADAC$99,620
RYAN'S WELL FOUNDATIONC$93,117
ABCD: ART BUILDING CHILDREN'S DREAMSC$90,000
INTERNATION CHILDREN'S AWARENESSC$72,000
LIFEWATER CANADAC$51,000
MIKINDURI CHILDREN OF HOPEC$50,000
CANADIAN VISION CAREC$40,500
SUNRISE OF LIFE (SOL) LTDC$25,000
TRANSFORMING FACES WORLDWIDEC$20,000
SAVE AFRICAN CHILD UGANDAC$7,500
REVIVE HOPE AFICA SOCIETYC$5,000
NATIONS CRYC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.7M · 16 repeat orgsC$316k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

C$3.7M
C$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PIH Partners In Health Canada Inc.
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$670k · revenue +241%
  • AB
    ABCD:ART BUILDING CHILDREN'S DREAMS
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$442k · revenue +10% · 65% of their budget
  • LC
    LIFEWATER CANADA
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$346k · revenue +385%

Funded once

  • DI
    Dignitas International
    one grant, 2017 · C$100k · revenue -100%
  • IO
    IMANI ORPHAN CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$35k · revenue +24%
  • MC
    MAJENGO CANADA
    one grant, 2020 · C$35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One4Another International

Relieve poverty by providing surgical care for children in africa

—
2
Athletes for Africa Aid Program

We relieve poverty in uganda and malawi by: a) providing programs for youth in need that promote health and well being including nutrition b) providing scholarships and support for education to youth in need c) providing leadership…

—
3
Anhart Foundation

Anhart Foundation works directly with local leaders in countries of low GDP to improve quality of life in rural communities with a focus on access to clean water access to medicine facilities improved education and access to micro grants.

—
4
Signs of Hope in Africa
—
5
I Want to Help Africa
—
6
Dreaming for Kids

Dreaming For Kids purpose is to advance education by providing funding to support the educational needs of individuals in the Ngusero-Arusha area of Tanzania. The ongoing programs for Dreaming For Kids are a sponsorship program that pays…

—
7
Villages Mwana

Contribute to the relief of poverty in Africa through the construction and maintenance of facilities such as school orphanages community centre and/or agricultural farm to help impoverished widows and orphans.

—
8
CanAssist African Relief Trust

Each year canassist provides funding to many projects in kenya uganda and tanzania including rainwater catchment systems latrines classrooms solar power school desks clinic supplies and building or irrigation systems for community and…

—
9
Forafrika

Forafrika's work is carried out through our six core programming pillars: humanitarian emergency response; access to safe drinking water sanitation and hygiene (wash); supporting quality education; enhancing health and nutrition; boosting…

—
10
Create Change Foundation

Ghana- creating educational opportunities and support for girls living in poverty by providing leadership training vocational skills training and business training. ghana - providing support for rural communities living in poverty in the…

—
11
Pendo International Projects

Quality education program zero hunger program clean water and sanitation program. school transportation services program

—
12
Partners for International Development (PfID)

PFID operates poverty alleviation projects in Kenya with a focus on the provision of basic education at the upper primary and secondary school level. The education projects serve economically disadvantaged children and youth. These…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Revive Hope Africa Society and the most unlike its peers is Memorial Church Port Ryerse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPIH Partners In Health Canada Inc. — C$670,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMANI CANADA — C$481,270 over 5y, 63% of budgetABCD:ART BUILDING CHILDREN'S DREAMS — C$442,000 over 5y, 65% of budgetLIFEWATER CANADA — C$346,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S AWARENESS — C$336,000 over 5y, 62% of budgetRYAN'S WELL FOUNDATION — C$323,117 over 3y, 13% of budgetNEW REALITY INTERNATIONAL — C$242,040 over 3y, 99% of budgetMIKINDURI CHILDREN OF HOPE — C$195,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetCANADIAN VISION CARE — C$127,500 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetTRANSFORMING FACES WORLDWIDE — C$111,300 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetDignitas International — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANADIAN PHYSICIANS FOR AID AND RELIEF — C$100,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetBETHANY RELIEF AND REHABILITATION INTERNATIONAL (CANADA) INC — C$80,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetSUNRISE OF LIFE (SOL) LTD — C$75,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetAMREF HEALTH AFRICA IN CANADA — C$69,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAJENHO CANADA — C$60,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetCANADIAN CROSSROADS INTERNATIONAL — C$40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIMANI ORPHAN CARE FOUNDATION — C$35,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSleeping Children Around The World — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBracelet of Hope — C$25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetSt. John's Anglican — C$20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMEMORIAL CHURCH PORT RYERSE — C$20,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetWAR CHILD CANADA — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGhana Medical Help — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSAVE AFRICAN CHILD UGANDA — C$7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREVIVE HOPE AFICA SOCIETY — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNATIONS CRY — C$5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCODE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTANBUR AFRICAN AID SOCIETY — C$3,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Peterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable FoundationON12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Peterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable Foundation · F. K. Morrow Foundation · Unifor Social Justice Fund / le Fonds de Justice Sociale D'Unifor · Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario Humanity Fund · Ross Ulmer Family Foundation · Gay Lea Foundation · Link Charity Canada Inc · The Peter Gilgan Foundation · United Way of Calgary and Area · The Calgary Foundation · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · The McLean Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 822372348:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Blossom’s filings →