Thode, SK · Charitable organization
Blackstrap Covenant Church Inc
Evangelical services and fundraising to provide community support and an educational scholarship
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Evangelical Covenant Church Inc | C$8,700 |
| Teen Challenge | C$8,000 |
| Dynamic Churches International | C$7,500 |
| Servant Partners Canada | C$4,000 |
| Salvation Army | C$4,000 |
| Town of Hanley | C$4,000 |
| Dundurn-Hanley Food Pantry | C$2,455 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ECEvangelical Covenant Church Inc6× · 2017–2024 · C$36k · revenue -29%
- ECEvangelical Covenant Church of Canada2× · 2022–2023 · C$18k
- PTPower to Change2× · 2019–2020 · C$17k
Funded once
- SPSamaritan's Purseone grant, 2022 · C$6k
- TCTeen Challengeone grant, 2022 · C$4k
- CMCovenant Mission and Ministryone grant, 2022 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.