Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Birtle, MB · Public foundation

Birtle and District Foundation Inc.

We promote the bible & district foundation to riase community awareness about the benefits of permanent endowments and leaving a legacy by our community we provide grants to qualified donees for a wide range of local projects based on public consultations.

C$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$40k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRAIRIE VIEW MUNICIPALITYC$25,317
PARK WEST SCHOOL DIVISION FOUNDATIONOF MANITOBA INC.C$14,578
FOXWARREN DISTRICT RECREATION CENTRE INC.C$5,000
BIRDTAIL COUNTRY MUSEUMC$5,000
FOXWARREN LEISURE CENTRE INC.C$4,400
BIRTLE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETYC$3,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$273k · 10 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

C$273k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PARK WEST SCHOOL DIVISION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$54k · revenue +236%
  • BA
    BIRTLE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$7k · revenue +134% · 31% of their budget
  • BC
    BIRDTAIL COUNTRY MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$6k · revenue ×14

Funded once

  • MS
    MORNING STAR DAY CARE INC.graduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridgetown & Area Historical Society

Museum and archives

—
2
Millet & District Recreational & Agricultural Society

Operation of recreational and agricultural activities in the town of millet

—
3
Merrickville Agricultural Society

Annual agricultural fair - livestock & horse shows; home garden and lifestyles exhibits; children's activities and entertainment; musical entertainment; horse truck and antique tractor pulls

—
4
Briercrest and District Museum Corp

Museum tours heritage day in june-demos ball tournament vintage car show dusty old farmers band fallen heroes display table of the fallen soldier remembrance day ceremony

—
5
Keystone Agricultural and Recreational Centre Incorporated

Providing recreational and agricultural facilities to the community of brandon and surrounding areas including events such as fairs weddings banquets hockey games figure skating curling food sales and concerts.

—
6
Ridgetown District Agricultural Society

Farmers' market light horse and pony show tractor show

—
7
Wood River Memorial Hall

Catering hall rental entertainment

—
8
Minitonas and District Arena Inc.

The arena provides recreational facilities to the local community for events such as figure skating hockey shinny indoor auctions pancake breakfasts community gatherings funerals and weddings. it is used both for children and adults.

—
9
Bowden & District Agricultural Society

Provides facilities and hosts for local rodeos and community.

—
10
Pokeshaw Black Rock Recreation Council Inc

Providing and maintaining facilities including a community centre and hall a community park and beach organising cultural community sports recreational and social events for residents and visitors.

—
11
Arborg & District Multi-Cultural Heritage Village Inc.

Museum tours hall rentals catering campground rentals fundraising events and/or draws weekly farmers markets mobile stage rentals senior fun days

—
12
Morrin and District Agricultural Society

Recreational services such as hockey and skating. operating and maintenance of community centre. also sponsoring and facilitating agricultural and community events.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foxwarren District Recreation Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Morning Star Day Care Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARK WEST SCHOOL DIVISION FOUNDATION — C$53,828 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetFOXWARREN DISTRICT RECREATION CENTRE INC. — C$17,100 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetBIRTLE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$7,354 over 3y, 31% of budgetBIRDTAIL COUNTRY MUSEUM — C$6,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetFOXWARREN LEISURE CENTRE INC. — C$4,400 over 1y, 11% of budgetBIRTLE DROP IN CENTRE INC — C$4,332 over 2y, 14% of budgetMINIOTA COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$2,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFoxwarren Historical Society — C$2,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMORNING STAR DAY CARE INC. — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLiving Legacy Foundation — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUpper Assiniboine Conservation District — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations…Canadian Online Givin…
Community Foundations of CanadaON6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 818691875:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Birtle and District’s filings →