Agassiz, BC · Charitable organization
Bilingual Buddhist Association
Seminar discuss with patrons & followers mother's day memorial & celebration of july 1 weekly buddhism seminars
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAKINAVA BUDDHIST EDUCATION AND CULTURAL SOCIETY | C$6,300 |
| FA YU BUDDHISM MONASTERY | C$2,100 |
| BODHIYANA BUDDHIST EDUCATION SOCIETY | C$2,100 |
| METTA YANA BUDDHIST CENTER | C$840 |
| TSENGDOK MONASTERY ASSOCIATION | C$500 |
| ZHENG FA MING BUDDHUST ASSOCIATION | C$420 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FYFA YU BUDDHISM MONASTERY3× · 2022–2024 · C$6k · revenue +30%
- MYMETTA YANA BUDDHIST CENTER3× · 2021–2024 · C$4k · revenue +87%
- ZFZHENG FA MING BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · C$960 · revenue +45% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAKINAVA BUDDHIST EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BODHIYANA BUDDHIST EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FA YU BUDDHISM MONASTERY ↗
- Who funds SAN HUI BUDDHIST SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds METTA YANA BUDDHIST CENTER ↗
- Who funds Tsengdok Monastery Association ↗
- Who funds ZHENG FA MING BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Hui Buddhist Society · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.