Red Deer, AB · Charitable organization
Beyond The Waters Edge Ministries Inc.
Continue to travel to church services outreaches + womens meetings
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMPACT NATIONS MINISTRIES | C$1,880 |
| CHRIST THE ANSWER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES | C$1,000 |
| IMPACT LIFE CHURCH | C$800 |
| HOPE MISSION | C$350 |
| PORTAL OF GLORY | C$300 |
| ROAR OF THE LION | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ILIMPACT LIFE CHURCH7× · 2017–2023 · C$8k · revenue +92%
- CTCHRIST THE ANSWER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES3× · 2022–2024 · C$2k · revenue +71%
- DTDAYSTAR TELEVISION NETWORK2× · 2020–2021 · C$1k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- NTNEW TESTAMENT OUTREACH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALone grant, 2020 · C$800 · revenue -43%
- HCHARVEST CHURCH INTERNATIONALone grant, 2017 · C$600 · revenue -53%
- FTFINISHING TOUCH MINISTRIESone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preaching the gospel prayer meetings worship services training and overseeing other pastors and churches planting churches ordaining pastors missions work within Canada and the world.
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Workshops Community Outreach Young Adult Ministries
Wednesday Bible Study Friday Prayer Meetings Sunday morning Church Services Limited Outreach Events
Bible teaching guest speaker spiritual counselling
Church activities with missionary outreach
Worship & prayer events within the City of Calgary and Province of Alberta. Worship & prayer events throughout Canada. Short-term international missions trips.
Sunday worship service weekly bible study and weekly prayer meeting.
Provide christian literature and bible lessons to interested people
Weekly church services and weekly bible studies
1. weekly worship services online and on-site held in calgary edmonton and sherwood park. 2. weekly small groups bible study held in person and online. 3. weekly group prayer meeting online and in person. 4. children's meeting every sunday…
We hold regular Sunday services and midweek meetings prayer meetings and bible studies. We provide community outreach. We support missions - both local and abroad. We provide children's programs.
Worship services and bible study groups
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impact Nations Ministries and Church (Red Deer) and the most unlike its peers is The Mustard Seed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMPACT LIFE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds CHRIST THE ANSWER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds IMPACT NATIONS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds DAYSTAR TELEVISION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NEW TESTAMENT OUTREACH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HOPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF REVIVAL MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HARVEST CHURCH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FINISHING TOUCH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHAMPION CITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds PORTAL OF GLORY ↗
- Who funds EDMONTON FAITH NATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds CANADA WORD OF FAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTEROSE GOSPEL CHURCH ↗
- Who funds KENNETH HAGIN MINISTRIES OF CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Finishing Touch Ministries Outreach Society · Jeff Loewen Ministries · City View Christian Centre · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.