Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Carlsbad Springs, ON · Charitable organization

Bethany United Church

Weekly worship & leadership in religious doctrine, weddings, funerals, baptism & special occasions.

C$4k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$456
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$601k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUNDC$1,809
LIFE CENTRE FOOD BANKC$475
HARVEST HOUSEC$456
OPERATION COME HOMEC$416
HELPAGE CANADAC$416
CIRCLE SQUARE RANCHC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$8k · 6 repeat orgsC$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

C$8k
C$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada Mission & Service Fund
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +22%
  • LC
    Life Centre Food Bank
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$958 · revenue ×29
  • HC
    He1pAge Canada
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$946 · revenue +301%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

    03Your field
    02the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

    Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    4/5
    Grew since you first funded

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada Mission & Service Fund — C$4,056 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHarvest House — C$986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLife Centre Food Bank — C$958 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHe1pAge Canada — C$946 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCircle Square Ranch — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2019) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

    Source object 108102302:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

    Play a game based on Bethany United Church’s filings →