Lethbridge, AB · Private foundation
Bernhard Melitz Foundation
Basic education support women empowerment support mico financing health and wellness program support
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$26k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A BETTER WORLD CANADA | C$20,000 |
| CUSO | C$12,000 |
| CODE | C$10,000 |
| CHILDREN BELIEVE | C$6,336 |
| UNICEF | C$5,000 |
| BROWN BAGGING FOR CALGARY'S STREET KIDS SOCIETY | C$5,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATIVE FUND OF CANADA | C$5,000 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ICINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATIVE FUND OF CANADA5× · 2020–2024 · C$49k · revenue +76%
- CCODE8× · 2017–2024 · C$41k · revenue +98%
- UUNICEF4× · 2020–2024 · C$31k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- GGREENPEACEone grant, 2019 · C$10k
- LCLIFEWATER CANADAone grant, 2023 · C$10k
- OIOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CANADAone grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -60%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…
World Vision Canada carries out programs in 55 countries which are funded through ongoing private and public funding and focuses on: • Livelihoods: including food environment & climate change and economic empowerment; • Health: including…
Save the Children Canada implemented programs focused on empowering girls and boys to fulfill their rights ensuring every last child has an equal opportunity to survive learn and be protected. This work included programs in health…
We believe every child has the right to clean water clean water international canada is dedicated to advancing wtaer sanitaion and hygiene (wash) through sustainable community-led programs. our work directly contributes to several united…
Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…
Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…
The charity War Child Canada helps families and communities in Afghanistan the Democratic Republic of Congo South Sudan Sudan Uganda and Yemen through education youth and women’s livelihoods support and other vital services. The charity…
Oxfam canada this year spanned 21 countries focusing on various humanitarian and development initiatives. in jamaica we address gender-based violence (gbv) through social norm changes and advocacy. in nicaragua we empower civil society for…
Our vision is one world where poverty is eliminated equality prevails and the rights of women and girls are fulfilled. to achieve this vision crossroads international works in partnership with local organizations in some of th poorest…
Children international canada carries out its charitable activities for the purpose of breaking generational poverty for the children they serve. this is done by delivering high-impact programs in four crucial areas: health education…
Generate Canada is a national charity that connects problem-solvers across sectors and value chains to generate solutions to the most complex challenges at the nexus of environment economy and society. The organization’s vision is a strong…
Seedchange is a leading international development organization that promotes family farms strong rural communities and healthy ecosystems around the world. with engaged canadians and partners in africa asia and latin america we help…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Canada and the most unlike its peers is Camp Carmangay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A BETTER WORLD CANADA ↗
- Who funds CUSO ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATIVE FUND OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN BELIEVE ↗
- Who funds CODE ↗
- Who funds UNICEF ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Lethbridge Youth Fondation ↗
- Who funds One Girl Can ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY ACRES SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CARE CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CANADA ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Food Bank Helping Society of Lethbridge ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FEED THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ALLY GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds BROWN BAGGING FOR CALGARY'S STREET KIDS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Dalit freedom Network Canada ↗
- Who funds FINCA ↗
- Who funds LETHBRIDGE INTERFAITH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds the Salvation Army ↗
- Who funds ALBERTA COUNCIL OF WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds GREENPEACE ↗
- Who funds CAREGIVERS ALBERTA ↗
- Who funds Camp Carmangay ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships Canada ↗
- Who funds YWCA Lethbridge and District ↗
- Who funds Wood's Homes Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · United Way of the Alberta Capital Region · Abundance Canada · The Calgary Foundation · Lethbridge Community Foundation · Atco Gas Employees' Community Service Fund · Atco Electric Epic · The Edmonton Community Foundation Priv Act · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · United Way of Calgary and Area · United Way of Regina · Link Charity Canada Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.