Grande Prairie, AB · Charitable organization
Believers Full Gospel Assembly of Grande Prairie
Sunday morning church services with children's sunday school.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES | C$6,356 |
| CHRISTIANS FOR ISREAL C41 CANADA | C$2,876 |
| MINISTRIES NETWORK CANADA | C$1,100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IAIMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$32k · revenue -16%
- SASHINING ARROW MINISTRIES5× · 2017–2021 · C$14k · revenue -61%
- EMEuropean Missions Inc.2× · 2017–2018 · C$10k · revenue +277%
Funded once
- CFCHRISTIANS FOR ISRAELone grant, 2020 · C$3k
- CFCHRISTIANS FOR ISREALone grant, 2019 · C$3k
- MNMINISTERS NETWORK CANADA3× · 2021–2023 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SHINING ARROW MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds European Missions Inc. ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS FOR ISREAL C41 CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES & MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE GRANDE PRAIRIE ↗
- Who funds RISING ABOVE MINISTRY, GRANDE PRAIRIE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.