Brussels, ON · Charitable organization
Belgrave Pastoral Charge
Worship services; support for canadian food grains bank north huron food share camp menesetung mission and service of u.c.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$2k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK | C$20,500 |
| NORTH HURON FOODSHARE | C$800 |
| HURON WOMEN'S SHELTER | C$200 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | C$200 |
| WOMEN'S INTER-CHURCH COUNCIL OF CANADA | C$135 |
| RURAL RESPONSE FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN | C$100 |
| UNITED WAY OF PERTH-HURON | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$735 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CFCANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANK6× · 2017–2024 · C$135k · revenue +103%
- UCUnited Church of Canada Mission and Service2× · 2017–2018 · C$14k
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION AND SERVICE2× · 2019–2021 · C$10k
Funded once
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUNDone grant, 2020 · C$4k
- CMCAMP MENESETUNGgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +117%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Huron safe homes for youth is a consulting referral short term residential crisis intervention program designed for youth (16 years of age and over) and where appropriate their families.
Food bank clothing 10 volunteers around 400 hours/year services for low income people
Provide meal and food programs
Food bank: distribution of food and hygiene products to north kawartha ontario individuals and families in need of assistance.
Provide food shelter and counseling to women and their children who are fleeing violence.
Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities
To relieve poverty by providing food and other basic supplies to persons of low income by establishing operating and maintaining a food bank.
Emergency food procurement. solicitation and distribution of food obtained from the community and from the food industry. food is distributed to local food banks hot meal programs and child nutrition programs.
Homeownership program with $0 downpayment 0% interest mortgage and housing costs at 30% of household income.
Project Harvest empowers rural families through training in food security and women's leadership.
Food security outreach drop in basic needs housing and income supports necomer services employment + education supports gender based violence supports indigenous programs
The Huron County Food Bank Distribution Centre (HCFBDC)’s purpose is to source and supply food and hygiene products for distribution to the food banks and aid agencies that we serve in Huron and Perth Counties. We also run a monthly Mobile…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Inter-Church Council of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Camp Menesetung. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANK ↗
- Who funds NORTH HURON COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE ↗
- Who funds CAMP MENESETUNG ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds HURON WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INTER-CHURCH COUNCIL OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds RURAL RESPONSE FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PERTH-HURON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blyth United Church Pastoral Charge · Wingham United Church · Dungannon Union Pastoral Charge · Brucefield Community United Church · Lions Club of Goderich Charitable Trust · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.