Toronto, ON · Private foundation
Belbeck-Fukakusa Family Foundation
The foundation spends its disbursement quota on qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RYERSON UNIVERSITY/TORONTO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY | C$142,857 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -36% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RURyerson University6× · 2017–2023 · C$1.2M · revenue +47%
- PPMHF4× · 2017–2021 · C$500k · revenue +59%
- YUYork University3× · 2017–2019 · C$300k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- PPMCFone grant, 2019 · C$120k
- WCWELLSPRING CANCER SUPPORT NETWORKone grant, 2017 · C$25k · revenue -36%
- APASIA PACIFIC FDN OF CANADAone grant, 2022 · C$10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.