Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Neepawa, MB · Public foundation

Beautiful Plains Community Foundation Inc

Neepawa is a registered public foundation established to support the cultural educational recreational and charitable purposes in the town of neepawa and surrounding areas the foundations' mission is to earn investment income and distribute this income to the community by means of grants.

C$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,400
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEEPAWA MINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONC$8,000
Individual grant recipientC$3,400
MCCREARY SCHOOLC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.2M · 31 repeat orgsC$34k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
16

Total granted

C$1.2M
C$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+91%

Still filing today

77%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH-NEEPAWA HEALTH CENTRE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$183k · revenue +10%
  • BP
    BEAUTIFUL PLAINS SCHOOL DIVISION
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$131k · revenue +35%
  • ND
    NEEPAWA & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL PROJECT COMMITTEE INC.
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$63k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEEPAWA MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · C$7k
  • RO
    RM OF GLENELLA-LANDSDOWNE
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k
  • ND
    NEEPAWA & DISTRICT FINE ARTS FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nickel District Conservation Authority

Flood control Environmental Education and Conservation Areas Trails Maintenance

—
2
Neepawa Health Auxiliaries

The neepawa health auxiliaries raide money to purchase equipment for the local hospital and care home. the equipment purchased are items that are not deemed essential but are greatly appreciated by the hopital and care home.

—
3
Berwick and District Community Association

Operates local arena and recreational facilities

—
4
Pierceland Recreation Association

Operating + maintaining the community hall arena sports grounds and other recreational programs.

—
5
Kaleidoscope Concerts Neepawa Inc.

Continued its mandate to provide culturally interesting and divers entertainment to the community of neepawa and surrounding area.

—
6
Board of Health for the Northwestern Health Unit (the Board)

Provides public health services to people resident in the kenora-rainy river district.

—
7
Nechako Valley Historical Society

Collecting artifacts for the local museum cataloging them and helping with displays documenting historical data digitizing and photohgraphing all artifacts

—
8
Nechako View Senior Citizens Home Society
—
9
Porcupine Plain & District Museum Society
—
10
Nickel Plate Cross Country Ski Club

Operation and maintenance of cross country ski trails

—
11
Nipawin & District Services to the Handicapped Inc.
—
12
Wainwright Prairie Rose Seniors Association

Floor curling shuffle board cribbage bridge darts pool yoga hall rental

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beautiful Plains Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Diabetes Ontario. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH-NEEPAWA HEALTH CENTRE — C$182,990 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUTIFUL PLAINS SCHOOL DIVISION — C$131,415 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEEPAWA & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL PROJECT COMMITTEE INC. — C$63,010 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetBUDZ 'N BLOOM DAYCARE — C$49,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetBeautiful Plains Museum — C$48,840 over 7y, 43% of budgetTOUCHWOOD PARK ASSOCIATION — C$47,062 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSALVATION ARMY (THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION...... — C$42,386 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVISCOUNT CULTURAL COUNCIL — C$32,669 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetFRANKLIN MEMORIAL HALL — C$27,500 over 3y, 64% of budgetBEAUTIFUL PLAINS AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$26,130 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetNEEPAWA THEATRE CENTRE INC. — C$21,980 over 5y, 14% of budgetVICTORIA'S QUILTS CANADA — C$16,520 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNEEPAWA KINSMEN SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC — C$15,175 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNEEPAWA CO-OPERATIVE PLAY CENTRE INC — C$14,491 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetMARGARET LAURENCE HOME — C$14,403 over 5y, 16% of budgetBURROWS TRAIL ART COUNCIL — C$8,541 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetNEEPAWA & DISTRICT DROP IN CENTRE — C$6,290 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetHOME ASSISTANCE NEEPAWA & DISTRICT — C$3,550 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTURTLE RIVER SCHOOL DIVISION — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES CANADA — C$1,550 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEEPAWA & AREA PALLIATIVE CARE — C$1,100 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEEPAWA & DISTRICT DISABLED PERSONS ASSOCIATION INC. — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCATS TNR AND RESCUE — C$825 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYSDI NEEPAWA CURLING CLUB — C$750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPine Creek School Division — C$600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeautiful Plains Archives — C$600 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetNeepawa & District Fine Arts Festival — C$515 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetBEAUTIFUL PLAINS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH-NEEPAWA HEALTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL PLAINS SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL PROJECT COMMITTEE INC. ↗
  • Who funds BUDZ 'N BLOOM DAYCARE ↗
  • Who funds Beautiful Plains Museum ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHWOOD PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION ARMY (THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION...... ↗
  • Who funds VISCOUNT CULTURAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN MEMORIAL HALL ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL PLAINS AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA THEATRE CENTRE INC. ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA'S QUILTS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA KINSMEN SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA CO-OPERATIVE PLAY CENTRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARGARET LAURENCE HOME ↗
  • Who funds BURROWS TRAIL ART COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA & DISTRICT DROP IN CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds HOME ASSISTANCE NEEPAWA & DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds TURTLE RIVER SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES CANADA ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA & AREA PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds NEEPAWA & DISTRICT DISABLED PERSONS ASSOCIATION INC. ↗
  • Who funds CATS TNR AND RESCUE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hylife Foundation Inc.Community Foundations…Boston Pizza Foundati…All Charities CampaignCanadian Online Givin…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Hylife Foundation Inc.MB8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hylife Foundation Inc. · Community Foundations of Canada · Boston Pizza Foundation · All Charities Campaign · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 894809730:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Beautiful Plains’ filings →