Coquitlam, BC · Private foundation
Baric Foundation
To solicit and receive gifts bequests trusts funds and property to hold invest manage and administer funds/property for the purpose of disbursing funds/property in accordance with the provisions of the ita.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$18k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$42k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW WEST COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH | C$52,175 |
| HANEY-PITT MEADOWS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION | C$30,000 |
| SIM CANADA | C$12,000 |
| KEATS CAMPS | C$6,000 |
| FRASER VALLEY GLEANERS | C$5,000 |
| COMPASS COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRES | C$3,000 |
| WINGS | C$2,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS BAPTIST CHURCH | C$2,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NWNEW WEST COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH8× · 2017–2024 · C$282k · revenue +114%
- HMHANEY-PITT MEADOWS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · C$180k · revenue +88%
- SCSIM CANADA6× · 2017–2024 · C$71k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- NBNEW BEGINNINGS BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship bible teaching missions to needy people adult and children's courses
Mission trip to burnt church weekend camps throughout the summer
Weekly online and in person sunday worship service and bible school. wednesday bible study. youth tuesday bible study.
Religious summer camps day programs retreats.
Sunday worship services sunday school bible studies prayer meetings church camps and fellowships.
Spread the gospel of jesus christ through loacal church ministries. church ministries include regular worship services bible studies sunday school youth and adult programs prayer meetings and counselling.
Bible teaching guest speaker spiritual counselling
Overnight Bible Camp providing camp experience for children and families
Summer camps for children and youth. retreats for all ages. podcast
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Beginnings Baptist Church and the most unlike its peers is Fraser Valley Gleaners Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW WEST COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds HANEY-PITT MEADOWS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SIM CANADA ↗
- Who funds KEATS CAMPS ↗
- Who funds BARNABAS FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WINGS ↗
- Who funds FRASER VALLEY GLEANERS ↗
- Who funds COMPASS COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRES ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian National Christian Foundation · United Way British Columbia · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · BenefAction Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.