Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Bais Menachem

To promote the efficiency and effectiveness of the charitable programs of chaya mushka seminary a registered charity by providing and maintaining facilities for this purpose.

C$384k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$186k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$35k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$346k
C$55,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$186,000
MY CHARITY FUNDC$105,000
CHABAD OF MONTREAL WESTC$55,000
MESIVTA OHR TEMIMIMC$18,386
LAMPLIGHTER FOUNDATIONC$17,000
TORONTO CHESSEDC$3,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$637k · 4 repeat orgsC$914k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

C$637k
C$893k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MY CHARITY FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$295k · revenue +17%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$191k · revenue +11%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF MONTREAL WEST
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$110k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$605k · revenue +45%
  • CO
    CIRCLE OF LIFE
    one grant, 2022 · C$150k · revenue -31%
  • ST
    SEA TO SEA
    one grant, 2022 · C$120k · revenue -91% · 44% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
3
The Sjs Legacy Foundation

As a foundation we look to support charities that offer bursaries grants and scholarships to under privledged students with an emphasis on jewish heritage and practise

—
4
The Yad Ezer Fund
—
5
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
6
Messorah Tzedakah Foundation

Donations to places of worship independant religious schools social service organizations and other qualified donees.

—
7
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
8
Maasim Tovim Foundation

To provide funds to registered charities

—
9
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
10
The E D Fund

Offers scholarships to needy students of rabbinical seminaries publications of religious periodicals and enhancing Jewish culture and heritage.

—
11
The Joseph Segal Family Foundation

Donations made to qualified donees.

—
12
Olam Chesed Yobone Fund
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Ohr Temimim Lubavitch and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION — C$605,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$295,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$191,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE OF LIFE — C$150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSEA TO SEA — C$120,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetCHABAD OF MONTREAL WEST — C$110,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetLAMPLIGHTER FOUNDATION — C$41,207 over 2y, 16% of budgetMESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM — C$18,386 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNER YISRAEL — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTORONTO CHESSED — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Charity FundThe F&R Hauer Charita…Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Foundation of …
My Charity FundON8.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Charity Fund · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-07-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under community resource.

Source object 789308681:2024-07-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bais Menachem’s filings →