Melfort, SK · Charitable organization
Bagley Baptist Mission Circle
We held 11 meetings (none in july).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NCEM | C$2,350 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | C$1,500 |
| TORCH TRAIL BIBLE CAMP (HOPE CANADA) | C$1,500 |
| NECF | C$1,200 |
| NIPAWIN BIBLE COLLEGE | C$1,000 |
| COMPASSION CANADA INC. | C$834 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- N(N.E.C.F. (FOR GUSTAFSONS)7× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +16%
- NBNIPAWIN BIBLE COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · C$7k
- TTTORCH TRAIL BIBLE CAMP6× · 2017–2023 · C$6k · revenue -48%
Funded once
- N(N.E.C.F. (FOR GUSTAFSON'S)one grant, 2020 · C$1k
- C(C.T.E.N. (FOR MCDONALD'S & PENNERS)one grant, 2020 · C$1k
- TTTORCH TRAIL BIBLE CAMPone grant, 2020 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.