Skip to content
Canadian charities

Hampstead, QC · Private foundation

Bachynski Family Foundation

Funding: goodman cancer mcgill university – lung cancer network montreal neurological institute and hospital (neuro)- sted microscopy project fund – neuro student support mcgill university – mcgill student fund.

C$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$120k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
  • C$50k–250k4 grants · C$420k
C$100,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCGILL UNIVERSITY MEDICINE - LUNG CANCER NTWORK ANGELC$120,000
MCGILL UNIVERSITY MONTREAL NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE AND HOC$100,000
MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATIONC$100,000
JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$100,000
MMCGILL UNIVERSITY - CANADA AWARDSC$30,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.1M · 3 repeat orgsC$260k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$2.1M
C$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+1545%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    McGill University Goodman Cancer Research Centre
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.4M · revenue +41%
  • MU
    MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$390k · revenue +140%
  • JG
    JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$260k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Saskatchewan
    one grant, 2017 · C$150k · revenue +24%
  • JG
    JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$100k
  • TD
    THE DR. R.E.M. LEE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$10k · revenue ×16

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMcGill University Goodman Cancer Research Centre — C$1,435,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$390,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$260,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Saskatchewan — C$150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DR. R.E.M. LEE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 838515021:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bachynski Family’s filings →