Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

B'Nai Zion Charity Fund

The relief of poverty the advancement of religion and the furtherance of education.

C$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$67k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k9 grants · C$25k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$46k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$67k
C$3,450
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$66,910
BNEI LEVI FOUNDATIONC$34,430
MOSDOS BOBOVC$11,680
KOLLEL TORAS MOSHEC$8,150
VMMC$3,705
CTMC$3,450
SATMAR KOLLELC$3,125
KOL TORAH SEFARDIC CONGC$2,700
CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOVC$2,000
INSTITUTE DE LA PENSES JUIFEC$1,100
KAV SHOLOMC$660
MENUCHA VESIMCHA CHARITYC$340
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$359k · 12 repeat orgsC$214k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
24

Total granted

C$359k
C$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$107k · revenue +423%
  • UO
    UFARATZTA OUTREACH
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$23k · revenue +19%
  • MB
    MOSDOS BOBOV
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$21k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • OR
    OASIS RETREAT
    one grant, 2023 · C$50k
  • CY
    CF YAD ELIEZER
    one grant, 2020 · C$25k · revenue -40%
  • CY
    CF YAD ELIEZER
    one grant, 2021 · C$21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
4
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
5
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
6
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
7
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
8
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—
9
Lomdei Torah

1. solicit recieve and maintain funds to promote the study of bible for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
12
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kollel Toras Moshe and the most unlike its peers is Lev Lazulat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/37
Grantees still filing
19/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$107,290 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$53,925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI LEVI FOUNDATION — C$34,430 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCB — C$33,660 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMazal Charity Fund — C$30,762 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCF YAD ELIEZER — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUFARATZTA OUTREACH — C$22,540 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMOSDOS BOBOV — C$21,055 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$20,506 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$18,150 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMCF — C$14,885 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Chaya Charitable Org. — C$8,730 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetKOLLEL TORAS MOSHE — C$8,150 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCdn. Friends of Yeshiva Tiferes — C$7,300 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetBAIS HATAVSHIL — C$6,300 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCF OF UTA — C$5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLECH LECHA — C$4,850 over 1y, 100% of budgetCONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV — C$3,740 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH V \'YIRAH — C$3,525 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCTM — C$3,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSATMAR KOLLEL — C$3,125 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOL TORAH SEFARDIC CONG — C$2,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIKUR CHOLOIM — C$2,200 over 1y, 60% of budgetB J HS — C$1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCFENTRE CHABAD — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG TOLDOS YY — C$1,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE DE LA PENSES JUIFE — C$1,100 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLEV LEZULAT — C$1,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetRabbinical College Yoel Moshe — C$950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAV SHOLOM — C$660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLABAVITCH WINNIPEG — C$420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizal — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA MISHKAN HATORAH — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The F&R Hauer Charita…The M & J Charitable …J & H Feldman Charita…Moral Arc FoundationHeitner Charitable Fo…Beth Oloth Charitable…The Koenig Family Fou…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…The George Hofstedter…The Chaim Moshe Fried…The Gross Family Foun…The IV Charitable Fou…
The F&R Hauer Charitable FoundationON17.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The M & J Charitable Trust · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Beth Oloth Charitable Organization · The Koenig Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The Gross Family Foundation · The IV Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 118812627:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on B'Nai Zion Charity’s filings →